<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Quote:Patrick Fay (Intel) in Software Tuning, Performance Optimization &amp; Platform Monitoring</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/Does-EIST-TRANS-work-on-Sandy-Bridge/m-p/978336#M2999</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Patrick Fay (Intel) wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On windows, you can use ETW (xperf/wpr/wpa) to show you frequency trasitions.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Patrick, as far as I can seen xperf reports only &amp;nbsp;C-state transitions (C0-C1), and for CPU frequency it always reports nominal value without any deviations although accordingly to MSR 0x198 multiplier is changing constantly.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I tried xperf version&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;4.8.7701 as other versions doesn't work for our environment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Alexander&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:31:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alexander_Alexeev</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-08-20T10:31:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Does EIST_TRANS work on Sandy Bridge?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/Does-EIST-TRANS-work-on-Sandy-Bridge/m-p/978334#M2997</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am trying to understand frequincy of transition of EIST (Enhanced&amp;nbsp;Intel&amp;nbsp;SpeedStep® Technology) on CPU, or rather frequency of change of CPU frequency.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I found only one event&amp;nbsp;EIST_TRANS (if other available, I would be glad to know).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;EIST_TRANS&amp;nbsp;isn't supported in vTune, so I configured its collection via home-made cli tool and collected values. No frequincy transition was detected.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The question is, whether&amp;nbsp;EIST_TRANS supported on SB or not. Are there any tricks to collect transitions?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;CPU&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Name Intel Xeon E5 2680&lt;BR /&gt; Codename Sandy Bridge-EP/EX&lt;BR /&gt; Specification Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 0 @ 2.70GHz&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Alexander&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:40:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/Does-EIST-TRANS-work-on-Sandy-Bridge/m-p/978334#M2997</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alexander_Alexeev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-19T13:40:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello Alexander,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/Does-EIST-TRANS-work-on-Sandy-Bridge/m-p/978335#M2998</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Alexander,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The EIST_TRANS event isn't&amp;nbsp;available on sandbridge systems, just core-2 and atom based systems.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On windows, you can use ETW (xperf/wpr/wpa) to show you frequency trasitions.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On linux, ftrace will show you frequency transitions.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Pat&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 15:19:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/Does-EIST-TRANS-work-on-Sandy-Bridge/m-p/978335#M2998</guid>
      <dc:creator>Patrick_F_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-19T15:19:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Quote:Patrick Fay (Intel)</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/Does-EIST-TRANS-work-on-Sandy-Bridge/m-p/978336#M2999</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Patrick Fay (Intel) wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On windows, you can use ETW (xperf/wpr/wpa) to show you frequency trasitions.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Patrick, as far as I can seen xperf reports only &amp;nbsp;C-state transitions (C0-C1), and for CPU frequency it always reports nominal value without any deviations although accordingly to MSR 0x198 multiplier is changing constantly.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I tried xperf version&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;4.8.7701 as other versions doesn't work for our environment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Alexander&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:31:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/Does-EIST-TRANS-work-on-Sandy-Bridge/m-p/978336#M2999</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alexander_Alexeev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-20T10:31:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>&gt;&gt;...The EIST_TRANS event isn</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/Does-EIST-TRANS-work-on-Sandy-Bridge/m-p/978337#M3000</link>
      <description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt;...The EIST_TRANS event isn't available on sandbridge systems, just core-2 and &lt;STRONG&gt;atom&lt;/STRONG&gt; based systems.

Here are two screenshots which simply demonstrate how &lt;STRONG&gt;EIST&lt;/STRONG&gt; works on a system with &lt;STRONG&gt;Intel Atom N270 CPU&lt;/STRONG&gt;:

&lt;STRONG&gt;[ 1 ]&lt;/STRONG&gt;

&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="eist1.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.intel.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10153i9094D2189612503D/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999&amp;amp;whitelist-exif-data=Orientation%2CResolution%2COriginalDefaultFinalSize%2CCopyright" role="button" title="eist1.jpg" alt="eist1.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;STRONG&gt;[ 2 ]&lt;/STRONG&gt;

&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="eist2.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.intel.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10154i7BA95BD4268E7329/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999&amp;amp;whitelist-exif-data=Orientation%2CResolution%2COriginalDefaultFinalSize%2CCopyright" role="button" title="eist2.jpg" alt="eist2.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:40:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/Does-EIST-TRANS-work-on-Sandy-Bridge/m-p/978337#M3000</guid>
      <dc:creator>SergeyKostrov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-23T15:40:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In the 1st screenshot EIST is</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/Does-EIST-TRANS-work-on-Sandy-Bridge/m-p/978338#M3001</link>
      <description>In the 1st screenshot &lt;STRONG&gt;EIST&lt;/STRONG&gt; is in effect and you see &lt;STRONG&gt;798MHz&lt;/STRONG&gt;.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:43:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/Does-EIST-TRANS-work-on-Sandy-Bridge/m-p/978338#M3001</guid>
      <dc:creator>SergeyKostrov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-23T15:43:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello Alexander,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/Does-EIST-TRANS-work-on-Sandy-Bridge/m-p/978339#M3002</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Alexander,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm using windows 8 with xperf 6.2.9200.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If I run with:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;xperf.exe -start -on CPU_CONFIG+POWER+PROC_THREAD -Buffering -Buffersize 1024 -MaxBuffers 100&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;do something&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;xperf.exe -flush -f trace.etl&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;xperf.exe -stop&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;xperf.exe -i trace.etl -tle -o trace.csv -symbols cacheonly verbose -a dumper&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;and&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;xperf.exe -i trace.etl -symbols cacheonly -a power &amp;gt; trace.etl.actions_power.txt&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In the trace.csv file you'll see a bunch of events like:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;PowerProcessorPerfState, 287951, Voltage, 1100, 800, 0x00000000, 0x0000000000000004&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;PowerProcessorPerfState, 287963, Voltage, 1100, 800, 0x00000000, 0x0000000000000008&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;which show the individual changes in frequency (timestamp, voltage, new freq, old freq, status, cpu mask)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The '-a power' report buckets the transitions. The output looks like:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;P-State Summary (% of time in each frequency):&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; CPU,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 800 MHz,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 900 MHz,&amp;nbsp; 1000 MHz,&amp;nbsp; 1100 MHz,&amp;nbsp; 1200 MHz,&amp;nbsp; 1500 MHz,&amp;nbsp; 1600 MHz,&amp;nbsp; 1801 MHz &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 65.26%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2.19%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 18.10%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.88%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.87%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.58%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.87%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 11.24% &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 65.26%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2.19%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 18.10%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.88%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.87%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.58%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.87%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 11.24% &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 65.26%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2.19%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 18.10%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.88%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.87%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.58%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.87%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 11.24% &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 65.26%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2.19%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 18.10%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.88%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.87%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.58%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.87%,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 11.24%&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;sigh... I wish I knew how to cut and paste stuff on this darn editor.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm bettting that if you computed the average non-halted frequency (with the unhalted_clockticks.thread unhalted_clockticks.ref events) over the same interval then, for say cpu 0, you'd see:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ave unhalted freq is = 800 * 0.6526 + 900 * 0.0219 + 1000 * 0.181 + 1100 * 0.0088 + 1200 * 0.0087 + 1500 * 0.0058 + 1600 * 0.0087 + 1801 * 0.1124 = ~967 MHz.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Or you could use the APERF/MPERF MSR ratio to compute the average non-halted frequency over the interval.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Pat&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:58:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/Does-EIST-TRANS-work-on-Sandy-Bridge/m-p/978339#M3002</guid>
      <dc:creator>Patrick_F_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-23T16:58:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Patrick, How could I verify a</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/Does-EIST-TRANS-work-on-Sandy-Bridge/m-p/978340#M3003</link>
      <description>Patrick, How could I verify a version of &lt;STRONG&gt;EIST&lt;/STRONG&gt; used on Intel &lt;STRONG&gt;Atom N270&lt;/STRONG&gt; CPU? Thanks in advance.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2013 23:22:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/Does-EIST-TRANS-work-on-Sandy-Bridge/m-p/978340#M3003</guid>
      <dc:creator>SergeyKostrov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-24T23:22:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello Sergey,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/Does-EIST-TRANS-work-on-Sandy-Bridge/m-p/978341#M3004</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Sergey,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I only know of original speed step and Enhanced speedstep (EIST). EIST is a feature bit in CPUID input 1, output reg ecx bit 7.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Pat&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Aug 2013 01:07:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/Does-EIST-TRANS-work-on-Sandy-Bridge/m-p/978341#M3004</guid>
      <dc:creator>Patrick_F_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-25T01:07:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

