<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic XFreq for Intel : need beta testers in Software Tuning, Performance Optimization &amp; Platform Monitoring</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/XFreq-for-Intel-need-beta-testers/m-p/1040969#M4566</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I'm programming an Intel Core 64-bits processor monitoring software named XFreq.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Recently, I have implemented C7 state; however I just have a Nehalem architecture processor, and wish it could be tested with Sandy-Bridge and above processors to check C7 accuracy.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" src="http://blog.cyring.free.fr/images/xfreq-cstates-R2148.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;XFreq is made for UNIX, it requires to be built from its &lt;A href="http://github.com/cyring/xfreq"&gt;source code&lt;/A&gt; or installed with an Arch Linux &lt;A href="http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfreq"&gt;package&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Please let me know if C7, and btw, others C-states, are OK with your CPU.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;
	CyrIng&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2015 13:10:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CyrIng</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-03-08T13:10:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>XFreq for Intel : need beta testers</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/XFreq-for-Intel-need-beta-testers/m-p/1040969#M4566</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I'm programming an Intel Core 64-bits processor monitoring software named XFreq.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Recently, I have implemented C7 state; however I just have a Nehalem architecture processor, and wish it could be tested with Sandy-Bridge and above processors to check C7 accuracy.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" src="http://blog.cyring.free.fr/images/xfreq-cstates-R2148.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;XFreq is made for UNIX, it requires to be built from its &lt;A href="http://github.com/cyring/xfreq"&gt;source code&lt;/A&gt; or installed with an Arch Linux &lt;A href="http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfreq"&gt;package&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Please let me know if C7, and btw, others C-states, are OK with your CPU.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;
	CyrIng&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2015 13:10:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/XFreq-for-Intel-need-beta-testers/m-p/1040969#M4566</guid>
      <dc:creator>CyrIng</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-08T13:10:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bonjour</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/XFreq-for-Intel-need-beta-testers/m-p/1040970#M4567</link>
      <description>Bonjour 

Je recherche des beta-testeurs pour me faire part de l'exécution XFreq avec les architectures &amp;gt; Nehalem 
En particulier, l'état C7  ? 

CyrIng</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 07:29:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/XFreq-for-Intel-need-beta-testers/m-p/1040970#M4567</guid>
      <dc:creator>CyrIng</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-20T07:29:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

