<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Intel PT addr_filter too narrow causes TIP packet to be missing on indirect call in Software Tuning, Performance Optimization &amp; Platform Monitoring</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/Intel-PT-addr-filter-too-narrow-causes-TIP-packet-to-be-missing/m-p/1704074#M8559</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I want to observe the TIP packets for both possible target addresses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I set:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;filter 0x5b2c46d30cb4/0x20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But in this case, the trace does not contain TIP packets indicating the call target.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, when I move the filter earlier:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;filter 0x5b2c46d30ca3/0x20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see both TIPs correctly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any known limitations where addr_filter&amp;nbsp;must include a few instructions preceding an indirect call in order for a TIP&amp;nbsp;packet to be emitted?&lt;BR /&gt;Alternatively, are there any other conditions that could result in missing or omitted TIP packets?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- CPU: Intel 12th Gen Core i7-12700&lt;BR /&gt;- Kernel: Linux 6.8.0-60-generic&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 02:38:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>corvus10086</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-07-18T02:38:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Intel PT addr_filter too narrow causes TIP packet to be missing on indirect call</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/Intel-PT-addr-filter-too-narrow-causes-TIP-packet-to-be-missing/m-p/1704074#M8559</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I want to observe the TIP packets for both possible target addresses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I set:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;filter 0x5b2c46d30cb4/0x20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But in this case, the trace does not contain TIP packets indicating the call target.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, when I move the filter earlier:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;filter 0x5b2c46d30ca3/0x20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see both TIPs correctly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any known limitations where addr_filter&amp;nbsp;must include a few instructions preceding an indirect call in order for a TIP&amp;nbsp;packet to be emitted?&lt;BR /&gt;Alternatively, are there any other conditions that could result in missing or omitted TIP packets?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- CPU: Intel 12th Gen Core i7-12700&lt;BR /&gt;- Kernel: Linux 6.8.0-60-generic&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 02:38:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/Intel-PT-addr-filter-too-narrow-causes-TIP-packet-to-be-missing/m-p/1704074#M8559</guid>
      <dc:creator>corvus10086</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-18T02:38:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

