<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic AMT vulnerability in Intel vPro® Platform</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-vPro-Platform/AMT-vulnerability/m-p/558124#M6479</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am looking to find some concrete information on what steps will need to be taken in order to mitigate the AMT vulnerability (CVE-2017-5689) in our environment and would appreciate any help/information that can be provided.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;We have never provisioned Intel AMT. Does this mean we are not vulnerable, or does the existence of AMT in the BIOS automatically make a device vulnerable to exploit?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;I do see the UNS and LMS services running on well over a hundred devices in our environment. Does any potential exploit target these services? Will simply disabling these services mitigate any vulnerability?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;We have many devices that I am sure have AMT that appear not to have these services even installed. Are they vulnerable?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My goal is to not have to update the BIOS on 1500 or more systems, especially since we have never made use of AMT. If I can simply disable services on devices by script within Windows, and ignore devices that don't have the services, that is the ideal outcome.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for any help provided.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sean&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 16:25:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SBohl1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-01-23T16:25:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>AMT vulnerability</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-vPro-Platform/AMT-vulnerability/m-p/558124#M6479</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am looking to find some concrete information on what steps will need to be taken in order to mitigate the AMT vulnerability (CVE-2017-5689) in our environment and would appreciate any help/information that can be provided.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;We have never provisioned Intel AMT. Does this mean we are not vulnerable, or does the existence of AMT in the BIOS automatically make a device vulnerable to exploit?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;I do see the UNS and LMS services running on well over a hundred devices in our environment. Does any potential exploit target these services? Will simply disabling these services mitigate any vulnerability?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;We have many devices that I am sure have AMT that appear not to have these services even installed. Are they vulnerable?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My goal is to not have to update the BIOS on 1500 or more systems, especially since we have never made use of AMT. If I can simply disable services on devices by script within Windows, and ignore devices that don't have the services, that is the ideal outcome.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for any help provided.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sean&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 16:25:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-vPro-Platform/AMT-vulnerability/m-p/558124#M6479</guid>
      <dc:creator>SBohl1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-23T16:25:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AMT vulnerability</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-vPro-Platform/AMT-vulnerability/m-p/558125#M6480</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As an update to this request for information, I found that even after running the mitigation tool against a device and taking the following three steps, unprovision (which it reported that it was never provisioned, as it should), disable client remote capabilities, and disable LMS services, and then re-running the discovery the device is still being reported as vulnerable. Is the mitigation tool not intelligent enough to determine that mitigation steps have been taken, or is there still a problem?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Again, thank you for any assistance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sean&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 16:08:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-vPro-Platform/AMT-vulnerability/m-p/558125#M6480</guid>
      <dc:creator>SBohl1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-24T16:08:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AMT vulnerability</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-vPro-Platform/AMT-vulnerability/m-p/558126#M6481</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Sean,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;My understanding from your post is that your goal is to not have to update the BIOS on 1500+ systems and that you have run the detection and mitigation tool for Intel SA-00075.  While performing the mitigation steps will help, your systems will still be considered vulnerable (even when re-running the tool against mitigated systems) until the firmware update for SA-00075 has been applied.&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;I could not tell from your post if you use a central management tool in your environment, like SCCM.  There are methods for performing queries of your environment to determine systems that are vulnerable and then create a task to update the firmware.&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;Referencing one post that might be helpful:&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;A href="https://communities.intel.com/thread/120105"&gt;https://communities.intel.com/thread/120105&lt;/A&gt; &lt;A href="https://communities.intel.com/thread/120105"&gt;https://communities.intel.com/thread/120105&lt;/A&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;Please let me know if there is anything further I can assist with.&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;Regards,&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;Michael A&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt; &lt;A href="https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/26755"&gt;https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/26755&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2018 21:42:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-vPro-Platform/AMT-vulnerability/m-p/558126#M6481</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-26T21:42:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AMT vulnerability</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-vPro-Platform/AMT-vulnerability/m-p/558127#M6482</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Sean,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;Checking to see if you had further questions.&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;Michael</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 21:47:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-vPro-Platform/AMT-vulnerability/m-p/558127#M6482</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-01T21:47:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

