- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I heard similar reports before v9.1 - for now, most of such cases are caused by the user, who didn't set compiler/linker options correctly. We suggest the user to use "/Zi", "/DEBUG", "/Fixed:no"fortheir release build.
The user can useVTune Analyzer's "Open Static Module Viewer..." to verify ifexpected functions nameare shown up.
Are you using pure C/C++ programming?
Are you using Large Address space?
Regards, Peter
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Peter,
I used the build options that you suggested and still get the same result. My application has some embedded assembly code as well. what do you mean m=by "large address space" ?
Thanks,
Siri
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Siri,
"Large Address Space" I said last time, I guess your application is big32-bit application, but run it on 64-bit platform to cause out of memory issue (exceed 2 gig). Usually we use "editbin.exe /LARGEADDRESSWARE your_app.exe". Ifyou have no such case, please ignore.
I mentioned to use VTune Analyzer's "Open Static Module Viewer..." to open your app, can you find expected function name (symbols)? (or use "dumpbin.exe /SYMBOLS"?). I want to know if this problem was caused by compiling or VTune Analyzer.
You said that your application has "embedded" assembly code - did you mean "inline" assembly code in C++ code.It should be not the problem!
Regards, Peter

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page