- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
hello,
I use i210 internal PHY in our designed embeded system board,the internal PHY can auto negotiate normally with 10Mbs/100Mbs Full/Half duplex. 1000Mbs full duplex cannot be auto negotiated whatever I set to auto-nego or 1G full-duplex forced at PC which connected to designed embeded system board by CAT 6,at the end it will show 100Mbs in PC network and share center.
I've tryed iNVM , FLASH and manually config PHY without both of them as below:
/* PHY init IGP 3 */
/* Enable rise/fall, 10-mode work in class-A */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x2F5B, 0x9018);
/* Remove all caps from Replica path filter */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x2F52, 0x0000);
/* Bias trimming for ADC, AFE and Driver (Default) */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x2FB1, 0x8B24);
/* Increase Hybrid poly bias */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x2FB2, 0xF8F0);
/* Add 4% to Tx amplitude in Gig mode */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x2010, 0x10B0);
/* Disable trimming (TTT) */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x2011, 0x0000);
/* Poly DC correction to 94.6% + 2% for all channels */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x20DD, 0x249A);
/* ABS DC correction to 95.9% */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x20DE, 0x00D3);
/* BG temp curve trim */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x28B4, 0x04CE);
/* Increasing ADC OPAMP stage 1 currents to max */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x2F70, 0x29E4);
/* Force 1000 ( required for enabling PHY regs configuration) */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x0000, 0x0140);
/* Set upd_freq to 6 */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x1F30, 0x1606);
/* Disable NPDFE */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x1F31, 0xB814);
/* Disable adaptive fixed FFE (Default) */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x1F35, 0x002A);
/* Enable FFE hysteresis */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x1F3E, 0x0067);
/* Fixed FFE for short cable lengths */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x1F54, 0x0065);
/* Fixed FFE for medium cable lengths */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x1F55, 0x002A);
/* Fixed FFE for long cable lengths */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x1F56, 0x002A);
/* Enable Adaptive Clip Threshold */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x1F72, 0x3FB0);
/* AHT reset limit to 1 */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x1F76, 0xC0FF);
/* Set AHT master delay to 127 msec */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x1F77, 0x1DEC);
/* Set scan bits for AHT */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x1F78, 0xF9EF);
/* Set AHT Preset bits */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x1F79, 0x0210);
/* Change integ_factor of channel A to 3 */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x1895, 0x0003);
/* Change prop_factor of channels BCD to 8 */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x1796, 0x0008);
/* Change cg_icount + enable integbp for channels BCD */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x1798, 0xD008);
/* Change cg_icount + enable integbp + change prop_factor_master
* to 8 for channel A
*/
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x1898, 0xD918);
/* Disable AHT in Slave mode on channel A */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x187A, 0x0800);
/* Enable LPLU and disable AN to 1000 in non-D0a states,
* Enable SPD+B2B
*/
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x0019, 0x008D);
/* Enable restart AN on an1000_dis change */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x001B, 0x2080);
/* Enable wh_fifo read clock in 10/100 modes */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x0014, 0x0045);
/* Restart AN, Speed selection is 1000 */
hw->phy.ops.write_reg(hw, 0x0000, 0x1340);
above config is for PHY ID :0x02A80391 which i copyed from igb source code ,actually PHY ID is 0x01410C00 in PHY identify 1&2(Reg:2&3) cause I have no idea for this problem after trying throusand routes.
Does someone know what the issue could be?
Thanks a lot.
Link Copied
2 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello cgao,
Thank you for posting in Intel Ethernet Communities.
Base on your inquiry, we have specific forum for these issues and I will be transferring this thread for faster response.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Michael L.
Intel® Customer Support Technician
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello, @cgao:
Thank you for contacting Intel Embedded Community.
Could you please confirm that this thread has been addressed to us in the forum stated on the following website?
In case that your answer is affirmative, you should follow the suggestions provided.
Best regards,
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page