Upon reading your documentation for the XL710 and the driver and the Linux Kernel ( ) , it appears that HW Timestamping exists for the XL710 on transmit. Specifically , Intel's driver uses it to implement PTP protocol in the driver file i40e_ptp.c for the Linux i40e driver. My question is a follow up to anther poster's question ( Suresh ) in conjunction with explaining some of the uncertainties about the driver spec and the Linux kernel spec: if one specifies the socket option SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE ( with SO_TIMESTAMP also specified ) how is timestamp included when "the packet is provided to the Network adapter" as defined in https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/timestamping.txt https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/timestamping.txt ?
My question pertains to this timestamping functionality, which according to linuxptp.sourceforge.net, is considered to be applied at the MAC level and not the PHY. Can you let me know what that means ? Are these timestamps always incrementing for packets as they are sent out over the wire or is there the potential that these timestamps will not be "strictly increasing" for consecutive packets sent out by the XL710 NIC ?
I am working on a project that doesn't care about the packets received, only that we know the ordering of the packets sent out. If we know that two consecutive packets arriving at MAC layer will always have the first packet leaving and timestamped with a lower timestamp than it's successor, then we are happy. Is this the case ? I wasn't sure i there is some reordering that my occur in the NIC between the MAC layer and Phy submission.
Thank you for your feedback,
Thank you for posting in Wired Ethernet Communities.
Regarding your query of HW transmission timestamp, kindly check out our datasheet -
page - 1047 to 1058 contains information that might be helpful.
If your XL710 is embedded to the system, you can also visit the embedded communities for support