FPGA, SoC, And CPLD Boards And Kits
FPGA Evaluation and Development Kits
5892 Discussions

Dynamic Reconfiguration architecture for native phy,ATX pll with embedded streamer

Rk_Athram
New Contributor I
554 Views

Hi @CheePin_C_Intel ,

I am using stratix 10 development kit,

From transceiver user guide:

A.4.7. Embedded Streamer (Native PHY) and

A.1.4. Embedded Streamer (ATX PLL)

Shares common register space for embedded streamer. for changing profile.

And PreSICE have common register space.

So do they have common register space for other configurations too ? like loopback mode change.

In my project i have to use dynamic reconfiguration for both ATX PLL and PHY.

as it is READ MODIFIED WRITE, with respect to which avmm_wait_request i can access the register data !

 

I am confused over its architecture,

1) same AVMM bus can be connected  to ATX PLL and NATIVE PHY ?

or 

2) to modify loopback modes Native PHY,AVMM Bus should be different,

     for any change in ATX PLL different AVMM BUS ?

 

 

Please see the attached snapshot, and share  which architecture is correct 

 

hope i will get clarity over this.

 

0 Kudos
1 Solution
CheePin_C_Intel
Employee
536 Views

Hi,


As I understand it, you have some inquiries related to the reconfiguration interfaces for ATX PLL and Native PHY. For your information, each of the IP has its own reconfiguration interface. Although the address value is similar i.e. 0x540 but they are two different address registers inside the device. You controller would need to connect and control them separately like case #2 in your sketch. Hope this clarify.


Please let me know if there is any concern. Thank you. 


View solution in original post

4 Replies
CheePin_C_Intel
Employee
537 Views

Hi,


As I understand it, you have some inquiries related to the reconfiguration interfaces for ATX PLL and Native PHY. For your information, each of the IP has its own reconfiguration interface. Although the address value is similar i.e. 0x540 but they are two different address registers inside the device. You controller would need to connect and control them separately like case #2 in your sketch. Hope this clarify.


Please let me know if there is any concern. Thank you. 


Rk_Athram
New Contributor I
534 Views

Hi @CheePin_C_Intel ,

Thank you for the information.

My doubt is clarified.

 

 

Regards,

Rajeshkumar

0 Kudos
CheePin_C_Intel
Employee
524 Views

Thanks for your update. Glad that it helps.


0 Kudos
CheePin_C_Intel
Employee
506 Views

I believe the initial inquiry has been addressed. This thread will be transitioned to community support. If you have a new question, feel free to open a new thread to get the support from Intel experts. Otherwise, the community users will continue to help you on this thread. Thank you.


0 Kudos
Reply