- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Can anyone give me some suggestions? Thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The Dell Latitude 3320 has an USB-C port on the left side, through which a DisplayPort HBR3 signal is tunneled. According to the manual: "DisplayPort Alt Mode 1.4 over USB Type-C port"
Provided that the DisplayPort HBR3 protocol runs over 4 lanes like via the Thunderbolt ports on my NUC11TNKv7 Tiger Lake platform, then you can output an 8K signal with VESA Coordinated Video Timing - Reduced Blanking (CVT-RB).
8K @ 60 Hz YCbCr 4:2:0 8-bit (CVT-RB) = 97% HBR3
The CS5569 Protocol Converter (PCON) should forward this as
8K @ 60 Hz YCbCr 4:2:0 8-bit (CTA-861) = 100% FRL4
Please create a Report for Intel Graphics Drivers and attach the output file here so that we can see what display capabilities are reported to the graphics driver by the quantumdata M41h.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi MUC,
Thank you for your valued reply.
1. As mentioned in previous, on 12th Gen Iris Xe graphics card, it seem that 8K60 420 (CVT-RB1) can output over DP HBR3 4lanes when DSC function is disabled.
2. While on 11th Gen Iris Xe graphics card, it seems that the max resolution only to 4096x2160@60 when DSC function is disabled.
3. As shown in your reply, the display is 8K60 420. Can you confirm that the 8K60 420 may output when the DSC function is disabled
Attachment1 is report for intel graphics driver.
Attachment2 is the edid captured on dp aux channel
Regards
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
There are differences between what is available according to the Report for Intel Graphics Drivers and what you have captured on the DP AUX channel:
(1) CTA-861 Extension Block:
-----------------------
YCbCr 4:2:0 Video Data Block:
VIC 198: 7680 × 4320 50 Hz 16:9 220 kHz 2376 MHz
VIC 199: 7680 × 4320 60 Hz 16:9 264 kHz 2376 MHz
-----------------------
When I show this to my NUC11 with i7-1185G7, the output is 8K60 as illustrated in my post above. Although it is inconsistent, it works even in the case of an additional duplicated CTA-861 block in the EDID. So yes, I can confirm that 11th Gen Iris Xe can do 8K @ 60 Hz YCbCr 4:2:0 8-bit (32 Gbps) without DSC. It would not be the first time that an Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) like Dell did not fully exploit the capabilities of processor-integrated graphics all the way to the physical connector. I am using the Synaptics VMM7100 (USB-C/Thunderbolt > HDMI) as a protocol converter.
So I think it is either the CS5569 or your Dell laptop and the way the DisplayPort protocol is delivered over that USB-C port. Maybe only on 2 lanes? You would have to check with Dell about that.
(2) Block 2, DisplayID Extension Block:
-----------------------
Version: 2.0
Extension Count: 0
Display Product Primary Use Case: Same primary use case as the base section
Display Interface Features Data Block:
Supported bpc for YCbCr 4:2:0 encoding: 8
Supported color space and EOTF standard combination 1: sRGB, BT.601, BT.709/BT.1886, BT.2020/SMPTE ST 2084
Video Timing Modes Type 7 - Detailed Timings Data Block:
These timings support DSC pass-through
DTD: 7680 × 4320 60 Hz 16:9 264 kHz 2069.76 MHz (aspect 16:9, no 3D stereo, preferred)
Hfront 48 Hsync 32 Hback 80 Hpol P
Vfront 16 Vsync 20 Vback 44 Vpol P
Vendor-Specific Data Block (0x7e) (VESA), OUI 3A-02-92:
Data Structure Type: DP
Default Colorspace and EOTF Handling: Native as specified in the Display Parameters DB
Number of Pixels in Hor Pix Cnt Overlapping an Adjacent Panel: 0
Multi-SST Operation: Not Supported
Pass through timing's target DSC bits per pixel: 9
-----------------------
The DisplayID Extension Block doesn't transport standard video timing. Here is a direct comparison:
Calculation reference:
https://tomverbeure.github.io/video_timings_calculator
https://www.cta.tech/Resources/Standards/CTA-861-OVT-Calculator
Is this an EDID of a real SAMSUNG TV?
If I show this DisplayID Extension Block additionally to the CTA-861 Extension Block to my NUC11 with i7-1185G7, then 8K can be chosen in Windows but the HDMI Resync fails. So this seems not compatible with my VMM7100. My hypothesis: The DTD in the DisplayID Extension Block is defined as "preferred", so the CTA-861 video timing in the CTA-861 Extension Block is probably overridden.

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page