Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
john_prothro
Beginner
26 Views

local api

The developers guide to the SCA, section B.16 CFG_GetProvisioningMode indicates... This command is disabled by default in the Intel AMT Release 2.0 and later and is enabled for Intel AMT Release 1.0 or for devices configured for Intel AMT Release 1.0 Legacy mode.

1) if it is disabled by default, can one turn it back on?

2) does this mean it will not/never work for 2.6?

thanks,

john

0 Kudos
3 Replies
Ajith_I_Intel
Employee
26 Views

Hi John,

As mentioned in the document this API should be used only when you have the configured the client in AMT 1.0 mode or Intel AMT Release 1.0 Legacy mode. This API is disabled for AMT 2.0 or later versions and cannot be enabled for these versions. Instead you can use the GetProvisioningMode API for AMT 2.0 or later. CFG_GetProvisioningMode API will not work for 2.6 version of AMT firmware.

Thanks.

john_prothro
Beginner
26 Views

CFG_GetProvisioningModeappears to work just fine for me on my 2.6 box...

11/06/2007 09:09:33 AM -- GetCodeVersions() - Succeeded
11/06/2007 09:09:33 AM -- DisplayCodeVersions() - BIOS Version: 68MCU Ver. F.07
11/06/2007 09:09:33 AM -- DisplayCodeVersions() - Intel AMT Code Versions:
11/06/2007 09:09:33 AM -- Flash: 2.6.0
11/06/2007 09:09:33 AM -- Netstack: 2.6.0
11/06/2007 09:09:33 AM -- AMTApps: 2.6.0
11/06/2007 09:09:33 AM -- AMT: 2.6.0
11/06/2007 09:09:33 AM -- Sku: 12
11/06/2007 09:09:33 AM -- VendorID: 8086
11/06/2007 09:09:33 AM -- Build Number: 1020
11/06/2007 09:09:33 AM -- Recovery Version: 2.6.0
11/06/2007 09:09:33 AM -- Recovery Build Num: 1020
11/06/2007 09:09:33 AM -- Legacy Mode: False
11/06/2007 09:09:39 AM -- AMT Heci Interface - CFG_GetProvisioningState() - Succeeded
11/06/2007 09:09:43 AM -- Provisioning State: Post Provisioned
11/06/2007 09:09:46 AM -- AMT Heci Interface - CFG_GetProvisioningMode () - Succeeded
11/06/2007 09:09:50 AM -- Provisioning Mode: Enterprise
11/06/2007 09:09:53 AM -- Legacy Mode = False

john_prothro
Beginner
26 Views

So is the doc broken or the code not functioning correctly? Have we broken something on our end?