- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
It is too bad that you were not able to add in the C++0X alternative function return syntax. i.e.
template< typename Lhs, typename Rhs> auto adding_func(const Lhs &lhs, const Rhs &rhs) -> decltype(lhs+rhs) {return lhs + rhs;}
I would like to put in my feedback that this is a very important feature and is something in the new Visual C++ as well as GCC. At this point, it is tough to use Intel's compiler because otherwise my library becomes extremely complicated with lots of head-scratching meta-programming.
To aid in my choice of features for writing the library, is there any hope in getting this in the next version?
Link Copied
2 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
This featureis already in our developmentcompiler, please consider signing up as a beta customer for our next release if you would like to test it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Sure, I would love to sign up for that. Can you point me in the right direction? What other C++0X features have been added to the beta?

Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page