- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi all
I am not able to understand the output we receive from the Averaging filer
with SDLT , the output is:
The time taken in number of ticks is 774874281
The time taken just for filter operation is 55768898
And with Serial Sample, output is much better:
The time taken in number of ticks is 766142320
The time taken just for filter operation is 51793809
It is clear from the response that Serial Sample is performing better, so why SDLT?
Can you direct me to correct and detailed doc or explain me, why someone should prefer Intel SDLT? Even i do not see any difference in output image.
Thank you
- Tags:
- CC++
- Development Tools
- Intel® C++ Compiler
- Intel® Parallel Studio XE
- Intel® System Studio
- Optimization
- Parallel Computing
- Vectorization
Link Copied
1 Reply
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Works perfectly with latest Intel Parallel Studio 2019 Update 4

Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page