- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I'm getting contradictory messages from the vectoriser in a number of places. These lines were sequential in the vectoriser report:
genselUtil.h(680) (col. 2): remark: loop was not vectorized: unsupported loop structure.
genselUtil.h(680) (col. 2): remark: LOOP WAS VECTORIZED.
genselUtil.h(680) (col. 2): remark: loop was not vectorized: unsupported loop structure.
Which is confusing to the user. I guess the question is whether this indicates the vectoriser is missing out on some potential vectorisations, is vectorising but reporting incorrectly or is correctly not vectorising some unsuitable code
Regards
David
genselUtil.h(680) (col. 2): remark: loop was not vectorized: unsupported loop structure.
genselUtil.h(680) (col. 2): remark: LOOP WAS VECTORIZED.
genselUtil.h(680) (col. 2): remark: loop was not vectorized: unsupported loop structure.
Which is confusing to the user. I guess the question is whether this indicates the vectoriser is missing out on some potential vectorisations, is vectorising but reporting incorrectly or is correctly not vectorising some unsuitable code
Regards
David
Link Copied
3 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
It looks ambigous. It would be nice if you could help with suitable testcase to narrow down the issue.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The latest compilers often create several versions of the loop, including, according to this report, both vectorized and non-vectorized ones. opt-report should report the multi-versioning. Several months ago, I filed problem reports on some cases where the newly added non optimized versions are the ones which are actually found at run time. I suppose this is most likely to happen with nested loops, at -O3.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I should have said in the original email that this is on Linux at O2 with ICC 12.0

Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page