- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
maybe I'm missing something obvious, but why is there a F32vec1 data type but no F64vec1?
TIA,
Georg.
maybe I'm missing something obvious, but why is there a F32vec1 data type but no F64vec1?
TIA,
Georg.
Link Copied
2 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
As Meg Ryan said in "Joe Versus the Volcano":
I have no response to that.
:-)
I was hoping someone would post some clever reason here, but there's nothing obvious to me as far as why we don't have F64vec1. I guess the answer is that, as far as I can tell, you're not missing anything obvious :-)
If you have a use for it, you might want to try submitting a feature request at premier.intel.com.
Dale
I have no response to that.
:-)
I was hoping someone would post some clever reason here, but there's nothing obvious to me as far as why we don't have F64vec1. I guess the answer is that, as far as I can tell, you're not missing anything obvious :-)
If you have a use for it, you might want to try submitting a feature request at premier.intel.com.
Dale
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I certainly have no use for it that a plain old double couldn't cover as well. However, *someone* seemed to think there is a use for F32vec1 (which is equally redundant as we have good old float).

Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page