- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

[cpp]void reduce (size_t const N, float const * RESTRICT const x, float const * RESTRICT const y, float const * RESTRICT const z, float const * RESTRICT const v, float * RESTRICT const A) { for (size_t i = 0; i < 10; ++i) { AThe latest compiler version 12.0.0 gives the following vec-report:= 0; } #pragma vector always #pragma ivdep for (size_t i = 0; i < N; ++i) { A[0] += x* y; A[1] += x* x; A[2] += y* y; A[3] += x* x* y* y; A[4] += x* y* z; } } [/cpp]

redux2.cc(24) (col. 4): remark: loop was not vectorized: vectorization possible but seems inefficient.

redux2.cc(30) (col. 4): remark: loop was not vectorized: existence of vector dependence.

redux2.cc(31) (col. 7): remark: vector dependence: assumed ANTI dependence between (unknown) line 31 and (unknown) line 31.

redux2.cc(31) (col. 7): remark: vector dependence: assumed FLOW dependence between (unknown) line 31 and (unknown) line 31.

redux2.cc(35) (col. 7): remark: vector dependence: assumed ANTI dependence between A line 35 and A line 35.

redux2.cc(35) (col. 7): remark: vector dependence: assumed FLOW dependence between A line 35 and A line 35.

redux2.cc(35) (col. 7): remark: vector dependence: assumed FLOW dependence between A line 35 and A line 35.

redux2.cc(35) (col. 7): remark: vector dependence: assumed ANTI dependence between A line 35 and A line 35.

redux2.cc(34) (col. 7): remark: vector dependence: assumed ANTI dependence between A line 34 and A line 34.

redux2.cc(34) (col. 7): remark: vector dependence: assumed FLOW dependence between A line 34 and A line 34.

redux2.cc(34) (col. 7): remark: vector dependence: assumed FLOW dependence between A line 34 and A line 34.

redux2.cc(34) (col. 7): remark: vector dependence: assumed ANTI dependence between A line 34 and A line 34.

redux2.cc(33) (col. 7): remark: vector dependence: assumed ANTI dependence between A line 33 and A line 33.

redux2.cc(33) (col. 7): remark: vector dependence: assumed FLOW dependence between A line 33 and A line 33.

redux2.cc(33) (col. 7): remark: vector dependence: assumed FLOW dependence between A line 33 and A line 33.

redux2.cc(33) (col. 7): remark: vector dependence: assumed ANTI dependence between A line 33 and A line 33.

redux2.cc(32) (col. 7): remark: vector dependence: assumed ANTI dependence between A line 32 and A line 32.

redux2.cc(32) (col. 7): remark: vector dependence: assumed FLOW dependence between A line 32 and A line 32.

redux2.cc(32) (col. 7): remark: vector dependence: assumed FLOW dependence between A line 32 and A line 32.

redux2.cc(32) (col. 7): remark: vector dependence: assumed ANTI dependence between A line 32 and A line 32.

Any insight would be greatly appreciated.

Link Copied

3 Replies

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

As you saw in the other thread, I have tried the local scalar variables successfully.

As I see vectorisation and parallelisation as sort of compiler optimisations that should not require the code to be altered, maybe with the exception of "hints", pragmas, etc., I would like to not add more lines of code than absolutely necessary to make it work.

Furthermore, I think that there is no vector dependence that I can see, so the compiler should vectorize. Especially, if I state the #pragma ivdep, shouldn't it?

At least it does not report that the dependence is proven.

Any idea how to get the compiler to honour the ivdep pragma? Or am I missing the dependency?

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Topic Options

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page