Intel® C++ Compiler
Community support and assistance for creating C++ code that runs on platforms based on Intel® processors.
7944 Discussions

WIN64: 'unresolved external symbol __fastfail referenced in function' error for Debug Qt builds using Windows ICC

sav
Novice
1,235 Views

Hello, everyone,

For Qt builds using Windows ICC got error:

        if not exist ..\..\lib\Qt5Cored.dll if exist ..\..\lib\Qt5Cored.dll.embed.manifest del ..\..\lib\Qt5Cored.dll.embed.manifest
        if exist ..\..\lib\Qt5Cored.dll.embed.manifest copy /Y ..\..\lib\Qt5Cored.dll.embed.manifest ..\..\lib\Qt5Cored.dll_manifest.bak
        xilink /NOLOGO /DYNAMICBASE /NXCOMPAT /DEBUG /DLL /SUBSYSTEM:WINDOWS /VERSION:5.12 /MANIFEST /MANIFESTFILE:..\..\lib\Qt5Cored.dll.embed.manifest /OUT:..\..\lib\Qt5Cored.dll @C:\Users\test\AppData\Local\Temp\Qt5Cored.dll.4736.250.jom
   Creating library ..\..\lib\Qt5Cored.lib and object ..\..\lib\Qt5Cored.exp
qlogging.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol __fastfail referenced in function "void __cdecl qt_message_fatal(enum QtMsgType,class QMessageLogContext const &,class QString const &)" (?qt_message_fatal@@YAXW4QtMsgType@@AEBVQMessageLogContext@@AEBVQString@@@Z)
..\..\lib\Qt5Cored.dll : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals
jom: C:\libQT-5.12-dev\build\qtbase\src\corelib\Makefile.Debug [..\..\lib\Qt5Cored.dll] Error 1120
jom: C:\libQT-5.12-dev\build\qtbase\src\corelib\Makefile [debug] Error 2
jom: C:\libQT-5.12-dev\build\qtbase\src\Makefile [sub-corelib-make_first] Error 2
jom: C:\libQT-5.12-dev\build\qtbase\Makefile [sub-src-make_first] Error 2
jom: C:\libQT-5.12-dev\build\Makefile [module-qtbase-make_first] Error 2

which relate to recently merged Change #225048.

Reproduced for:

  • builds using Windows ICC with Debug configuration,

not reproduced for:

  • builds using Windows ICC with Release configuration,
  • builds using mingw-w64 and MSVC.

Environment:

It was reported on Qt bugtracker (see QTBUG-68751), and Qt Developers believe it's a compiler bug.

 

Best,

Alexander

 

0 Kudos
0 Replies
Reply