Hello.
I was wondering if the following is a known issue and/or has a workaround. This code fails to compile when any of the problematic lines is uncommented (error messages are provided in comments):
#include
template< typename some_type >
class some_class {
public:
void fn1() {
auto qwe = [](){};
auto asd = ( std::function< void() > )qwe;
}
static void fn2() {
auto qwe = [](){};
auto asd = ( std::function< void() > )qwe;
}
void fn3( std::function< void() > f ) {
std::function< void() > _f = (){f();};
}
void fn4( const std::function< void() > &f ) {
std::function< void() > _f = (){f();};
}
};
int main() {
some_class x;
// uncomment any of the followings 4 lines:
x.fn1(); // internal error: backend signals
//some_class::fn2(); // internal error: backend signals
//x.fn3( [](){} ); // internal error: type_pointed_to: not a pointer type
//x.fn4( [](){} ); // internal error: backend signals
return 0;
}
This also fails:
class some_non_template_class {
public:
void fn3( std::function< void() > f ) {
std::function< void() > _f = (){f();}; // internal error: type_pointed_to: not a pointer type
}
};
Versions:
Intel C++ Compiler XE for applications running on IA-32, Version 12.1.2.278 Build 20111128;
MSVS 2010 SP1 (MSVC compiles this just fine).
Have tried compiling from IDE, and also with just "icl main.cpp"
----
Vladimir
