- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I'm a little confused, when you say "the microsoft compiler works fine", do you mean gcc? MS doesn't have a compiler for Mac that I'm aware of. Also, if you can post some sort of reproducible test case that would help immensely. Also, are you using XCode or the command line for your build?
Thanks!
Dale
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I'm a little confused, when you say "the microsoft compiler works fine", do you mean gcc? MS doesn't have a compiler for Mac that I'm aware of. Also, if you can post some sort of reproducible test case that would help immensely. Also, are you using XCode or the command line for your build?
Thanks!
Dale
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Got any suggestions on a workaround?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Got any suggestions on a workaround?
Unfortunately I haven't seen this problem. Can you give any clues as to how I might reproduce the problem? Also, you might give 11.1 a try, which I think is available now. I don't know that it fixes this problem, but that would be the latest one to try, just to make sure.
Dale
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Got any suggestions on a workaround?
Unfortunately I haven't seen this problem. Can you give any clues as to how I might reproduce the problem? Also, you might give 11.1 a try, which I think is available now. I don't know that it fixes this problem, but that would be the latest one to try, just to make sure.
Dale
With reserve ....
Add to -I(path include concerned) /*.pch (same is informed in Makefile sometime for hpp header typed) ???
or add option way -pch_dir ..........
I not understand where relation (/usr/include/c++/4.0.0/bits/stl_iterator_base_types.h(150): error: identifier "_Tp" is undefined) ???
_Tp defined in an pch precompiled header ???
Best regards
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi
So just try including a ton of headers, that include headers, that include headers, etc. and see what happens.
I think is not the problem ....
when i compile program same Firefox or Kernel or GCC full all options or big mainframe, sometimei use Make with option
--jobs-=16 and i have not problem stack, ProbablyI think shared busy precompiled objects in wait can be * 10 that you can having with your headers...
Actually if you must change value stack default to ulimit (recent O/S) you having incorrect programming in some points.
also if you having big program use Makefile for an best contol at step (link)
Best regards
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Actually if you must change value stack default to ulimit (recent O/S) you having incorrect programming in some points.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi
(its intel's compiler.) You can test compile chapter Shakespeare if you want, command line have no restricted rule.....
The problem appears to be because of the stack size limit on mac osx. We had a similar problem on linux, and on linux we are able to get it to work by using "ulimit -s unlimited". Osx seems to have some harder restrictions on stack sizes.
(LINUX) Must be increased stack with g and ICC ??? or only ICC ???
I have see in www that some users same problem..
make the test with compile wrapped mpich2 if really problem stack
can be showed appropriate message i think.
I not dispute that you think about your interpretation errors ,can be true
Only the message that you give not corresponding overflow stack
I can reproduce same style errors (ton errors) when i make manually lib .SO or.a with ( ar,ranlib... ext...) and depending header incorrect (repertory) patched..
i am with doubt and interesting to understandor confirmif icc take greater part of stack that gcc ??
(without Tbb,Mpi or Omp or ClooG ext...)
Best regards
Added
you answer....
Well I agree, but in this case its not our program thats requiring huge stack space, its intel's compiler.
Can not be icc ,you receiving messages errors from compiler , if compiler in status overflow you receiving (stack overflow..) from the system.
if really stack problem ? is in your program ...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Not problem, resulting probably my bad control for correctly understand English language..
also i think my help translator program must increase size stack.. for better results ......
Best regards
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page