- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Guys
We have compiled an optimised exec using the intel c compilers under windows NT (using studio .NET) and redhat linux.
The benchmark for the linux exec is 19.0s
The benchmark for the NT exec is 320.0s
Surely this cant be right. Does the OS make this difference ?
Each was basically compiled using /O2
We have compiled an optimised exec using the intel c compilers under windows NT (using studio .NET) and redhat linux.
The benchmark for the linux exec is 19.0s
The benchmark for the NT exec is 320.0s
Surely this cant be right. Does the OS make this difference ?
Each was basically compiled using /O2
Link Copied
2 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
This is a very interesting comparison. Have you tried gcc & VS .NET and what're their results?
If gcc or VS .NET gives much better performance, could you open an issue at our Premier support website?
Thanks very much,
Jennifer
If gcc or VS .NET gives much better performance, could you open an issue at our Premier support website?
Thanks very much,
Jennifer
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
We have seen some differences between OS, but nothing of that magnitude. It would be interesting to see your testcase. Yes, if you can, please do as Jennifer suggests.
Max [Intel Compiler Team]
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page