Intel® Distribution of OpenVINO™ Toolkit
Community assistance about the Intel® Distribution of OpenVINO™ toolkit, OpenCV, and all aspects of computer vision-related on Intel® platforms.

Bus Error

YaSeR20
Beginner
1,179 Views

Hello There,

 

I built from source openvino 2022 for Raspberry Pi 4 - 32-bit OS - python 3.7.3 following the steps in https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000057005/boards-and-kits.html 

Everything is working in terms of importing all the libraries and installation however, I am getting the error "Bus error" when I run the deblur demo code, as is shown below:

 

pi@rpi1:~/openvino/open_model_zoo/demos/deblurring_demo/python $

python deblurring_demo.py --input blur.jpg --model model/deblurgan-v2.xml -d MYRIAD
[ INFO ] OpenVINO Runtime
[ INFO ] build: custom_master_862aebce714c61902531b097e90df6365f325a46
[ INFO ] Reading model model/deblurgan-v2.xml
[ DEBUG ] Reshape model from [1, 3, 844, 1200] to [1, 3, 864, 1216]
[ INFO ] Input layer: blur_image, shape: [1, 3, 864, 1216], precision: f32, layout: NCHW
[ INFO ] Output layer: deblur_image, shape: [1, 3, 864, 1216], precision: f32, layout:
Bus error

 

Looking forward to hearing from you,

Cheers,

Y,

0 Kudos
7 Replies
Megat_Intel
Moderator
1,114 Views

Hi Y,

Thank you for reaching out to us.

 

I have validated from my end by building OpenVINO™ 2022.1 from source for Raspbian OS on Raspberry Pi 4 Model B. I encountered similar error when running the Image Deblurring Python* Demo using FP16 model. The error message is as shown below:

fp16_pi.png

 

We will escalate this issue to the relevant team for further action.

 

On another note, I was able to run the demo successfully when I use FP32 model. Please have a try running the demo using FP32 model.

 

Here are the results of using FP32 model for Image Deblurring Python* Demo:

 fp32_pi.pngresult_pi.png

 

 

Regards,

Megat

 

0 Kudos
YaSeR20
Beginner
1,089 Views

Hello Megat,

Thank you for your response; much appreciated.

 

Yes, with precision FP32 is working. However, the process is too slow compared to your results, with an error at the end of the process. Also, the output is not promising, as seen in the attached file. 

 

pi@rpi1:~/openvino/open_model_zoo/demos/deblurring_demo/python $ python deblurring_demo.py --i blur.png --m deblurgan-v2.xml --d MYRIAD --output test.png
[ INFO ] OpenVINO Runtime
[ INFO ] build: custom_master_862aebce714c61902531b097e90df6365f325a46
[ INFO ] Reading model deblurgan-v2.xml
[ DEBUG ] Reshape model from [1, 3, 720, 1280] to [1, 3, 736, 1280]
[ INFO ] Input layer: blur_image, shape: [1, 3, 736, 1280], precision: f32, layout: NCHW
[ INFO ] Output layer: deblur_image, shape: [1, 3, 736, 1280], precision: f32, layout:
[ INFO ] The model deblurgan-v2.xml is loaded to MYRIAD
[ INFO ] Device: MYRIAD
[ INFO ] Number of streams: MYRIAD_THROUGHPUT_STREAMS_AUTO
[ INFO ] Number of model infer requests: 1
OpenCV: FFMPEG: tag 0x47504a4d/'MJPG' is not supported with codec id 7 and format 'image2 / image2 sequence'
[ INFO ] Metrics report:
[ INFO ] Latency: 89465.5 ms
[ INFO ] FPS: 0.0
[ INFO ] Decoding: 62.3 ms
[ INFO ] Preprocessing: 1.7 ms
[ INFO ] Inference: 2488.4 ms
[ INFO ] Postprocessing: 22.8 ms
[ INFO ] Rendering: 50.6 ms
python3: ../../libusb/io.c:2116: handle_events: Assertion `ctx->pollfds_cnt >= internal_nfds' failed.

 

 

 

 

0 Kudos
YaSeR20
Beginner
1,078 Views

Update about my previous reply:

 

I used the code from openvino_notebooks: https://github.com/openvinotoolkit/openvino_notebooks

And it works properly now without any errors. However, I still have a problem with time inference on the MYRIAD-Raspberry Pi; it took 2.29 minutes to process one image, and I am not getting the desired output (the image is still blurry) !?

 

Looking forward to hearing from you,

Cheers,

Yaser,

 

0 Kudos
Megat_Intel
Moderator
1,009 Views

Hi Yaser,

I got the same blurry result as yours when running the demo using Intel® Neural Compute Stick 2 (NCS2) on Raspberry Pi 4 Model B. When I tried with an Intel® Core™ i7-10610U CPU, on Windows 10, I got a better result. I share my results here:

 

NCS2:

test.jpeg

 

CPU:

test_cpu.jpeg

 

When using CPU, we observe significant performance improvement as well as reduced latency (approximately 95%). Therefore, we recommend you use CPU Plugin for better results.

 

 

Regards,

Megat

0 Kudos
YaSeR20
Beginner
988 Views

Hello Megat, 

 

Thank you for your response,

 

Yes, I know CPU or GPU provides better results than the MYRIAD. However, the whole point is to have it running on a Raspberry Pi for faster inference and good results.

 

Regards, 

Yaser,

 

0 Kudos
Megat_Intel
Moderator
956 Views

Hi Yaser,

Intel® Neural Compute Stick 2 (NCS2) is a plug & play AI device for deep learning inference at the edge. It can be used as a prototype with low-cost edge devices such as Raspberry Pi 4 and other ARM host devices, and it offers access to deep learning inference without the need for large, expensive hardware.


However, the general performance of NCS2 is generally lower than GPU, and high-end CPUs due to different processing and computing power thus resulting in different performance results.



Regards,

Megat


0 Kudos
Megat_Intel
Moderator
912 Views

Hi Yaser,

This thread will no longer be monitored since we have provided a suggestion. If you need any additional information from Intel, please submit a new question.



Regards,

Megat


0 Kudos
Reply