- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I'm trying to implement a PI controller in FPGA using schematic entry method in altera quartus II . I'm using the following equivalent PI controller equation,
c(n) = c(n-1)+kp*(e(n)-e(n-1))+Ki*T*e(n-1) where, c(n) = controller output Kp= proportional constant Ki=integral constant e(n)=Reference -actual input T=sampling period I'm implementing it for 8 bit data. I couldnot implement c(n-1) in the above equation using schematic entry. Can someone help me implement this? I would be grateful if you can suggest me other ways of implementing PI controller like in VHDL.Link Copied
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
30 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Mr. Frank,
you are right, and i don't want a supervisor for my research because i already have one:). i just didn't see any comment since August,2010. now i'm working to understand the control and design part of digital PID , and the next step after finishing the simulation of the PID is to implement it based of FPGA. I have only one question, i'm going to buy Altera DE2-70 , according to your experince in this field do you think it's sufficient to implement the PID. Please advice me which board is the good for my research:unsure: . thanks in advanced- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I tried to attache the board link of Altera DE2-70 but it's not allowed yet for me :(
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
--- Quote Start --- I tried to attache the board link of Altera DE2-70 but it's not allowed yet for me :( --- Quote End --- You'll need to clarify what you mean by "board link". The board has an Embedded USB-Blaster circuit on one of the USB connectors (it should be written on the PCB silkscreen next to the connector). I think its the outer-most connector (nearest the edge of the board). The other two USB connectors are connected to a USB PHY for custom applications. Cheers, Dave
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
--- Quote Start --- You'll need to clarify what you mean by "board link". The board has an Embedded USB-Blaster circuit on one of the USB connectors (it should be written on the PCB silkscreen next to the connector). I think its the outer-most connector (nearest the edge of the board). The other two USB connectors are connected to a USB PHY for custom applications. Cheers, Dave --- Quote End --- The board link is the website link, sorry for confusing you :) "To be able to post links or images your post count must be 4 or greater. You currently have 3 posts. Please remove links from your message, then you will be able to submit your post."
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
--- Quote Start --- The board link is the website link, sorry for confusing you :) --- Quote End --- Ah, I see. The DE2-70 has plenty of logic for a PID controller. The lower-cost DE0-nano, BeMicro, and BeMicro-SDK boards would also have enough logic. What is just as important, is what are your I/O requirements? Does your PID controller need an ADC or a DAC? How are you going to interface to the real-world? You need to look at both the FPGA board and the interface boards, and make sure you can connect them together without too much work. The DE2-70 and DE0-nano interface to boards via their GPIO headers. Terasic have some ADC/DAC boards. The BeMicro and BeMicro-SDK boards have an 80-pin edge connector. You can connect a PROTO board to that header for interfacing to custom logic. Cheers, Dave
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
--- Quote Start --- The DE2-70 has plenty of logic for a PID controller. The lower-cost DE0-nano, BeMicro, and BeMicro-SDK boards would also have enough logic. --- Quote End --- I absolutely agree. I can tell, that I have implemented a power electronics controller with multiple PIDs on a small (8K LEs) Cyclone II, DE0 Nano has factor 2.5 more.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
--- Quote Start --- I absolutely agree. I can tell, that I have implemented a power electronics controller with multiple PIDs on a small (8K LEs) Cyclone II, DE0 Nano has factor 2.5 more. --- Quote End --- How about the Max7000 ,I got one free . is it plenty of logic for a PID controller??? If not i have to bye another board. Gazal
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
--- Quote Start --- How about the Max7000 ,I got one free . is it plenty of logic for a PID controller? --- Quote End --- Not at all. MAX7000 is a CPLD, a reasonable solution for pure digital logic designs. Even the largest MAX7000 with 512 macro cells won't allow more than a rudimentary (e.g. 8 bit data width) controller. A recent development kit like DE-0 Nano would make much more sense.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
--- Quote Start --- Not at all. MAX7000 is a CPLD, a reasonable solution for pure digital logic designs. Even the largest MAX7000 with 512 macro cells won't allow more than a rudimentary (e.g. 8 bit data width) controller. A recent development kit like DE-0 Nano would make much more sense. --- Quote End --- well, i am not working on a conventional PID, so i'm a little bit worry if the Nano will be plenty to apply an intelligent algorithms.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
--- Quote Start --- i am not working on a conventional PID, so i'm a little bit worry if the Nano will be plenty to apply an intelligent algorithms. --- Quote End --- So implement your algorithm and synthesize it in a device. You do not need a board for this. Just select the same device as used on the DE0-nano and see if it has enough resources. If it does not, then try a larger device, or try a larger device from a specific evaluation board, eg., the DE2-115. Cheers, Dave
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »