- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
I get this error message out of the compiler, but the temporary file is deleted by the compiler. I set TMPDIR to a local directory.
/Users/kbelco/junk/ifortn6EcC4.i90: catastrophic error: **Internal compiler error: segmentation violation signal raised** Please report this error along with the circumstances in which it occurred in a Software Problem Report. Note: File and line given may not be explicit cause of this error.
Any idea how to get the compiler to leave the temporary files alone so I can send it to you guys?
Noel Belcourt
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Ah, -save-temps.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Except that -save-temps doesn't work, doesn't appear to save any temporary files at all.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The temp file is rarely of interest. Intel support will want the program source, the source of any include files or modules it needs, and the exact command you used to invoke ifort.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks Steve, I figured. But this is a govt research code that is export controlled so in all likelihood I won't be able to send the source.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Then Intel support won't be able to help you. The temp file just contains the internal-use options converted from the command line options.
Perhaps you can try to reduce the test case into something you can submit. Would I be correct in assuming that it compiled with an earlier version?
Also try eliminating selective options from the command line to see if there's one that triggers the error. If so it may give you a way to proceed with your application for now.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes, you are correct in your assumption, code worked fine with last year's compiler.

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page