Intel® High Level Design
Support for Intel® High Level Synthesis Compiler, DSP Builder, OneAPI for Intel® FPGAs, Intel® FPGA SDK for OpenCL™
Announcements
Intel Support hours are Monday-Fridays, 8am-5pm PST, except Holidays. Thanks to our community members who provide support during our down time or before we get to your questions. We appreciate you!

Need Forum Guidance? Click here
Search our FPGA Knowledge Articles here.
505 Discussions

OpenCL FPGA incremental compilation error

fellipe-leandro
Beginner
548 Views

Hello,

I'm trying to compile a kernel (.cl) file in the FPGA devcloud  (node s001-n137 : Arria 10 1.2) using the -incremental option for the first time, but the compilation process throws this error:

Error (23031): Evaluation of Tcl script a10_partial_reconfig/flow.tcl unsuccessful

The command line that I used to perform the compilation  is:

aoc -profile -incremental input_file.cl -o output_file.aocx -board=pac_a10

Without the -incremental option the compilation is successful.

What could be causing this error for incremental compilation?

 

Labels (1)
0 Kudos
4 Replies
BoonBengT_Intel
Moderator
358 Views

Hi @fellipe-leandro,

 

Thank you for posting in Intel community forum, hope this message find you well and apologies for the delayed in response.
Apologies for the inconvenient cause, sometime the quartus_sta might not allocate enough memory for the design and might cause some error.
Please do try to increase the size of the swapfile to see if that helps.

 

Best Wishes
BB

fellipe-leandro
Beginner
334 Views
BoonBengT_Intel
Moderator
341 Views

Hi @fellipe-leandro,

 

Greetings, unfortunately as we do not receive any further clarification on what is provided. Hence this thread will now be transitioned to community support. If you have new queries or further query on this thread, please feel free to open a new thread or reopen this thread to get support from us. Otherwise, the community users will further help you with doubts in this thread.

 

Best Wishes
BB

fellipe-leandro
Beginner
336 Views
Reply