- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I'd like more information on this bug fix, please. Our application does JPEG decoding with restart markers
Link Copied
6 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello,
We noticed one bug when handling one restart marker image. It happens on In the file src\io\uic_io\src\membuffin.cpp, at at line ~ 58
Change : if(m_currpos + offset >= m_buflen || m_currpos + offset < 0)
To: if(m_currpos + offset > m_buflen || m_currpos + offset < 0)
This was fixed in the latest release.
Thanks,
Chao
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
You write this was fixed in the latest relase. Do you mean w_ipp-samples_p_7.0.7.064.zip? In this package, membuffin.cpp does not have the above fix.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thomas,
You are right. That fix haven't been copied from development branch to release branch. Sorry.
Bill, could you update your source file manually and look if this solves your issue?
If not, please provide us with more details or sample file.
Regards,
Sergey
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I have put in the fix manually.
However, I get a feeling that many of the other IPP 7 Update 7 documented fixes are actually not in the samples download. You see, I always do a file-by-file comparison between releases of the ipp samples, and I only found very few changes.
Please check...
However, I get a feeling that many of the other IPP 7 Update 7 documented fixes are actually not in the samples download. You see, I always do a file-by-file comparison between releases of the ipp samples, and I only found very few changes.
Please check...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
After looking into this, I believe that someone on my team was the one who submitted the bug report (#654054) for this. We received the patch for this problem back in 12/2011.
I'm concerned that your release process allows a bug to bemarkedas fixed, without a verification that it actually was fixed. It makes me wonder what else was put in the release notes, without actually being there.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello Bill,
It was a mistake that the CQ was put into the bug fix list. The fix is planned to add into the future release. Sorry for the confusion here. Meanwhile, we are internally checking the process, soit could provide more accurate fix list.
As Sergey suggested, it still needs to manually change some source code for the fix on the IPP 7.0.7 at this moment.
Thanks,
Chao

Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page