- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
There seems to be an error in the following link to the manual:
http://software.intel.com/sites/products/documentation/hpc/ipp/ippi/ippi_ch11/ch11_image_proximity_measures.html
According to the manual:
CrossCorrValid_NormLevel
Computes normalized cross-correlation between an image and a template.
However, should it be the normalized cross-correlation coefficient ? (the word coefficient is missing, and its addition means a totally different algorithm ?)
http://software.intel.com/sites/products/documentation/hpc/ipp/ippi/ippi_ch11/ch11_image_proximity_measures.html
According to the manual:
CrossCorrValid_NormLevel
Computes normalized cross-correlation between an image and a template.
However, should it be the normalized cross-correlation coefficient ? (the word coefficient is missing, and its addition means a totally different algorithm ?)
Link Copied
3 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
IPP solution is based on http://scribblethink.org/Work/nvisionInterface/nip.html (with several modifications oriented to performance optimization based on Intel architecture specific) - you can see that both wordings are used in this article -normalized cross-corelation as well as normalized cross-correlation coefficient. As result of IPP functionis not 1 single coefficient but a matrix of such coefficients - we prefer to use "normalized cross-corelation" term.
Regards,
Igor
Regards,
Igor
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
But in the link of the manual I provided in my original message there is inconsistency:
- CrossCorrFull_NormLevel
Computes normalized correlation coefficient between an image and a template. - CrossCorrSame_NormLevel
Computes normalized correlation coefficient between an image and a template. - CrossCorrValid_NormLevel
Computes normalized cross-correlation between an image and a template.
The first two use the word coefficient, and the last one does not, even though the only difference between the three options are the Full/Same/Valid options.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Ok, thank you, will bring our documentation to consistent state in the next 8.0 release.
regards,
Igor
regards,
Igor
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page