- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi all,
Does anybody know if there is a comparison of the FFT and FFTinv functions of the IPP and MKT libraries?
I would like to use FFT for 2D & 3D images.
Thanks,
Thomas
Does anybody know if there is a comparison of the FFT and FFTinv functions of the IPP and MKT libraries?
I would like to use FFT for 2D & 3D images.
Thanks,
Thomas
Link Copied
3 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
You probably talk about MKL (Match Kernel Library)?
If so, it is the fact that MKL uses IPP FFT inside for small sizes andown FFT implementation for big sizes of matrixes.
Regards,
Vladimir
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks for your reply.
Do you have an estimate of these small and big sizes?
I have several kind of images.
Some are 64^3, others are 512^3.
Thanks,
Thomas
> If so, it is the fact that MKL uses IPP FFT inside for
> small sizes and own FFT implementation for big sizes
> of matrixes.
Do you have an estimate of these small and big sizes?
I have several kind of images.
Some are 64^3, others are 512^3.
Thanks,
Thomas
> If so, it is the fact that MKL uses IPP FFT inside for
> small sizes and own FFT implementation for big sizes
> of matrixes.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
regarding IPP, you canfind performance numbers ofalmost allIPP functions in IPP oolsperfsys folder.
You can ask about performance of MKL on MKL's forum.
Regards,
Vladimir
Message Edited by vdudnik on 10-10-2005 09:51 AM

Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page