- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi IPP Team,
I am currently working with Intel IPP for optimized performance, and I noticed that some functions have a 64-bit version (with _L suffix), while others do not.
Functions that have a 64-bit version:
ippsMulC_32fc_I | ippsMulC_32fc_I_L |
ippsMulC_32fc | ippsMulC_32fc_L |
Functions that do not have platform aware versions
ippsAddC_32f_I |
ippsAddC_32fc |
Could you clarify if Intel plans to provide 64-bit support for these functions? If not, is there an alternative way to efficiently handle large data sizes with IPP?
Thanks in advance for your help!
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
We are implementing the platform-aware APIs to satisfy IPP users. For the request about ippsAddC_# platform aware APIs, please submit a support ticket through Online Service Center. Also, attached the guidance about How to Create a Support Request.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @Ruqiu_C_Intel
Thank you for your response. ippsAddC_# was just an example, but my project relies on several other IPP functions that currently lack platform-aware (_L) versions.
I’d like to know if Intel already has plans to add platform-aware support for all APIs, or if I need to submit a separate request for each function individually and it would be done on need basis?
Thanks again for your help!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @Apoorva_Shetty , We are implementing the Platform-aware functions depending on users' input. So, yes, please submit a separate request with the functions that will be adopted in your project.

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page