- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi all,
I have not found any ill effects to calling ippStaticInit() in code that gets compiled into a driver for XP. However, I do see in the documentation that "The function ippStaticInit should not be used in the driver implementation."
1. "THE" driver implementation? Should I read this as, "don't call this function within driver code?"
2. If so, does anyone know why this is? As I said, I've done it and not seen any problems after extensive testing, but I'd like to know more about why this statement was listed.
Thanks!
I have not found any ill effects to calling ippStaticInit() in code that gets compiled into a driver for XP. However, I do see in the documentation that "The function ippStaticInit should not be used in the driver implementation."
1. "THE" driver implementation? Should I read this as, "don't call this function within driver code?"
2. If so, does anyone know why this is? As I said, I've done it and not seen any problems after extensive testing, but I'd like to know more about why this statement was listed.
Thanks!
Link Copied
1 Reply
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello,
documentation is a bit outdated in that particular case. It was limitation for earlier versions of IPP, starting from version IPP 5.x you cancall IPP static dispatcher in kernel mode drivers.
Regards,
Vladimir
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page