Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives
Deliberate problems developing high-performance vision, signal, security, and storage applications.
6726 Discussions

ippiMorphOpenBorder_8u_C1R is slower than older IPP version

BaffledCoder
New Contributor I
576 Views

Hello all,
Recently I shifted from IPP 5.3 to IPP 2021.6.2 and did a performance test following is the result.

  IPP 5.3.3.082 IPP 2021.6.2  
  Time Per 1000 calls Time Per 1000 calls Percentage Decrease
ippiMorphOpenBorder_8u_C1R 4730.390188 6188.637276 -30.827

 

As you can see, for ippiMorphOpenBorder_8u_C1R, we are taking 30% more time as compared to IPP 5.3.
Whereas other functions like ippiDCTFwd_32f_C1R and ippiFFTFwd_RToPack_32f_C1R are faster by 40%.

Also, ippiMorphCloseBorder_8u_C1R is faster by 30%

My machine supports up to AVX2

 

Labels (1)
0 Kudos
4 Replies
NoorjahanSk_Intel
Moderator
574 Views

Hi,


Thanks for reaching out to us.


Could you please provide us with a smaple reproducer code(steps if any)? So that we can try it from our end.

Also please let us know how you are measuring the performance along with OS details and Compiler version being used.


Thanks & Regards,

Noorjahan.


0 Kudos
NoorjahanSk_Intel
Moderator
534 Views

Hi,


We haven't heard back from you. Could you please provide an update on your issue?


Thanks & Regards,

Noorjahan.


0 Kudos
BaffledCoder
New Contributor I
517 Views

Hi @NoorjahanSk_Intel 
There is another thread where I have been providing updates. Please check
It would be better if you could merge these
Regards,
Shubham Sharma

0 Kudos
NoorjahanSk_Intel
Moderator
501 Views

Hi,


we will no longer monitor this thread as you have already started discssion in other thread(https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiMorphOpenBorder-8u-C1R-is-slower-than-older-IPP-version/m-p/1437492#M28208). We will continue addressing this issue in the other thread


Thanks & Regards,

Noorjahan.



0 Kudos
Reply