Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Trial-Member
New Contributor III
479 Views

Question regarding BIOS 77 for NUC8i5BEH

Jump to solution

Hi all,

Yesterday I updated my BIOS to 77. I had a brief look to the Notes and was wondering about some information given.

 

Has somebody an idea what Intel means, wenn they say ...

Fixed issue with basic standard speed performance

or is there more information on this that I haven't found?

 

0 Kudos
1 Solution
Wanner_G_Intel
Moderator
204 Views

Hello Trial-Member,

 

We would like to update this thead.

 

Fixed issue with basic standard speed performance: This is a fixed that was implemented with the BIOS update and has to do with processor speed/performance.

 

BMeis1,

 

To better assist you, we recommend that open a new thread.

 

Regards,

 

Wanner G.

Intel Customer Support Technician

A Contingent Worker at Intel

View solution in original post

9 Replies
Wanner_G_Intel
Moderator
204 Views

Hello Trial-Member,

 

Thank you for submitting your question on this Intel® Community.

 

We will do further research about this. What is the model number of the Intel® NUC kit you own?

 

Wanner G.

Intel Customer Support Technician

A Contingent Worker at Intel

n_scott_pearson
Super User Retired Employee
204 Views

Yea, please do not use ambiguous titles such as "NUC8". This describes a large number of NUC systems, kits and boards. The naming convention for NUC product codes is detailed here. For your particular case, you should have use CH, IN, BE, HV or HV, whichever it is.

 

...S

Trial-Member
New Contributor III
204 Views

Sorry, I was too vague in the device specification. It's a NUC8i5BEH.

BTW: In the past (dome month ago) there were different Forum Pages for the models. I am missing this feature ...

Wanner_G_Intel
Moderator
204 Views

Hello Trial-Member,

 

Thank you for your response. 

 

We will look into these issues and update this thread as soon as possible.

 

Wanner G.

Intel Customer Support Technician

A Contingent Worker at Intel

BMeis1
Beginner
204 Views

Hello all,

 

I think the Bios 0077 has a issue. It doesn´t work with my M.2 SSD Samsung 979 EVO 500GB. I made a Downgrade to 0075 an all works well.

 

Beste Regards

Bernd Ch. M.

Trial-Member
New Contributor III
204 Views

Hi @BMeis1​ ,

 

Do you mean a 970 EVO?

 

Haven´t found anything like 979 EVO.

 

I have a 970 EVO (MZ-V7S1T0BW) using as System Drive and a 850 EVO (MZ-75E1T0B) for internal Backups.

Both work fine on my NUC8i5BEH with BIOS 77.

 

In another NUCi5BEH I have a 850 EVO (MZ-N5E1T0BW) installed as System Drive and a 860 EVO (MZ-76E1T0B) for internal Backups.

Both work fine with BIOS 77.

 

Have you checked the Samsung Firmware using Samsung Magician Software?

My Firmware Versions are:

970 EVO M.2 = 2B2QEXE7

850 EVO SATA = EMT02B6Q

850 EVO M.2 = EMT21B6Q

860 EVO SATA = RVT04B6Q

BMeis1
Beginner
204 Views

Hi Trial-Member,

 

yes, I mean the 970 EVO M.2. The Firmware release is 2B2QEXE7.

 

I have a NUC8i7BEH, Build J72688-303. BIOS 75 makes no problems, BIOS 77 creates al lot of sudden death.

 

Regards

Trial-Member
New Contributor III
204 Views

Thats strange.

OK, I have a NUC8i5BEH (instead of i7), but I can't imagine that this is the reason for the problems.

 

I have installed the BIOS 77 and absolutely no problems with the above mentioned SSDs.

Wanner_G_Intel
Moderator
205 Views

Hello Trial-Member,

 

We would like to update this thead.

 

Fixed issue with basic standard speed performance: This is a fixed that was implemented with the BIOS update and has to do with processor speed/performance.

 

BMeis1,

 

To better assist you, we recommend that open a new thread.

 

Regards,

 

Wanner G.

Intel Customer Support Technician

A Contingent Worker at Intel

View solution in original post

Reply