Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
JKuba2
Beginner
224 Views

BUG REPORT: VHDL 2008 target aggregate assignment leads to missing driver Warning

Hello,

 

I'm using target aggregates in VHDL 2008 and I found out, that Quartus (specifically "Quartus Prime Version 19.4.0 Build 64 12/04/2019 SC Pro Edition") fails to assign drivers to some of the target signals when they are std_logic_vector with the width of 1.

Here is an example code I tested it on:

library ieee; use ieee.std_logic_1164.all; use ieee.numeric_std.all;   entity EXAMPLE is generic( WIDTH : natural := 8 ); port( IN_A : in std_logic_vector(WIDTH-1 downto 0); IN_B : in std_logic_vector(WIDTH-1 downto 0);   OUT_A : out std_logic_vector(WIDTH-1 downto 0); OUT_B : out std_logic;   OUT_C : out std_logic_vector(WIDTH-1 downto 0); OUT_D : out std_logic_vector(1-1 downto 0);   OUT_E : out std_logic_vector(WIDTH/3-1 downto 0); OUT_F : out std_logic_vector(1-1 downto 0); OUT_G : out std_logic_vector(2-1 downto 0); OUT_H : out std_logic_vector(0-1 downto 0); OUT_I : out std_logic_vector((WIDTH+1)-(WIDTH/3+1+2+0)-1 downto 0) ); end entity;   architecture FULL of EXAMPLE is   signal result : unsigned(WIDTH+1-1 downto 0);   begin   my_process : process (all) begin result <= ("0" & unsigned(IN_A)) + ("0" & unsigned(IN_B));   (OUT_A, OUT_B) <= std_logic_vector(result);   (OUT_C, OUT_D) <= std_logic_vector(result);   (OUT_E, OUT_F, OUT_G, OUT_H, OUT_I) <= std_logic_vector(result); end process;   end architecture;

Synthesizing this code leads to a warning:

Warning (13024): Output pins are stuck at VCC or GND Warning (13410): Pin "OUT_D[0]" is stuck at GND File: example.vhd Line: 17 Warning (13410): Pin "OUT_F[0]" is stuck at GND File: example.vhd Line: 20

meaning Quartus was unable to assign value to those parts of the aggregate, where the signal had a 1-bit width. You can see, that the bug does not occur, when the signal is a simple std_logic, but I have multiple cases where the width of the signal is determined by generics and it is possible for it to result as 1.

 

Thanks

0 Kudos
8 Replies
121 Views

Hi,

 

For 1-bit signal, you have to use std_logic instead of std_logic_vector.

 

Thanks.

Best regards,

KhaiY

JKuba2
Beginner
121 Views

Are you saying it's done on purpose and you don't plan on fixing it?

Because it would be a much lesser complication even if it was the other way around and the expression didn't work for std_logic instead. Than I can imagine turning all std_logic signals that are used in aggregates into 1-bit vectors; but this way it cannot be done so easily, since a vector with generic width can sometimes by 1 bit wide and sometimes wider. So the only way to solve this would be creating a std_logic version of each std_logic_vector and switch between them in separated IF branches based on the vector width. And since there are N signals in the aggregate, it would mean up to 2**N different branches of code to solve this. That really makes the whole point of target aggregates being used for code simplification useless.

 

Sincerely,

JKuba2

JCaba5
Beginner
121 Views

Hi,

 

I have the same problem as JKuba2. This bug is really annoying.

 

Sincerely,

Jakub

121 Views

Hi,

 

I received the reply from our developer. You may refer to the workaround in the test_19_4_0_64_workaround.QAR attached.

 

Thanks.

Best regards,

KhaiY

 

JKuba2
Beginner
121 Views

Hello

 

Well, this workaround fixes the non-working short aggregate assignment by not using the short aggregate assignment. I know how to do that, too. The point was to be able to assign multiple signals from one signal without having to explicitly write the width of each and every one of them and thus shorten the code and make it more clear and readable. I know I can make it work the same way without the aggregates. But it bugs me that it doesn't work in this specific case, even though it should.

 

I'm glad to see that someone was actually assigned to look into this, but this is not the result I was looking for, sadly. What I'm looking for is at least a hint suggesting that someone will try to fix the bug in the synthesis tool, even if it is in a version a year from now.

 

Thanks.

Best regards,

JKuba2

121 Views

Hi,

 

Yes. I have reported this to the developer and this is scheduled to be fix in the future release.

 

Thanks.

Best regards,

KhaiY

JKuba2
Beginner
121 Views

Thank you very much.

JKuba2

SSilu
Beginner
117 Views

I also confirm this annoying bug. It's shame quartus is lacking such basic support of VHDL 2008 features. I took me a few days to find out why my design was not working. Today I also realized that conditional assignment in process VHDL 2008 feature is not working. Quartus simply synthesize logic away.

   rx_pkt_len_proc : process(clk_avmm) is
   begin
      if rising_edge(clk_avmm) then
               ready <= '1';
               ready <= '0' when ready = '1';
      end if;
end process;