Intel® Xeon® Processor and Server Products
Intel® Xeon® Processors, Data Center Products including boards, integrated systems, and RAID Storage
5181 Discussions

Problem with Intel server forum post getting rejected

SimonHF
Beginner
679 Views

Hello, I tried posting to this forum. My 2nd post. The 1st post was successful. But the 2nd post got rejected as spam for some reason. I thought it might be because it had a link to a Debian forum post embedded, so I posted again without the link but this re-try post also got rejected as spam. I messaged the forum  admin to say what happened and explain the posts are legit, but also no response. Can somebody please help? Thanks, Simon

 

Screenshot 2025-03-20 112744.png

0 Kudos
5 Replies
Sazirah
Employee
627 Views

Hi SimonHF,


Thank you for posting in Intel Community Forum.


Regarding your enquiry, we only able to find 1 related case in our record (Subject: Need help with Xeon CPU Interconnect / UPI monitoring) and assuming the second forum thread is similar or related to the 1st case thus it marked as spam. For this issue, we can see that our Intel Engineering support has responded on GitHub post: https://github.com/intel/pcm/issues/919. Kindly give them some time to revert back to your enquiry. This will be the proper path for your question and the best option for development assistance. We recommend you to continue the conversation through that portal for better assistance.


Since there is not much we can assist you further, please be inform that we will be closing this thread at our end. 


Thank you for your understanding.


Regards,

Sazzy_Intel

Intel Customer Support Technician



0 Kudos
SimonHF
Beginner
617 Views

Hi Sazzy_Intel,

Thanks for the response.

> assuming the second forum thread is similar or related to the 1st case 

No, actually the second forum thread [1] [2] is different from the first thread in that it is about the intel_cpufreq governor. It does mention Intel pcm which the 1st case also mentions, but in this case it's all about the frequency reported by Intel pcm. But really, the second forum thread is all about intel_cpufreq governor which is not mentioned in the 1st case.

This second forum thread also has nothing to do with the Github issue listed. It's about a totally separate issue!

The links [1] and [2] can only be seen by me because the posts are currently marked as spam. I did click on the link to "appeal" to the administrator, but I have heard nothing, and the posts are still marked as spam.

Please help!

Thanks,
Simon

[1] https://community.intel.com/t5/Server-Products/Questions-about-surprising-results-with-intel-cpufreq-governor/td-p/1676521
[2] https://community.intel.com/t5/Server-Products/Questions-about-surprising-results-with-intel-cpufreq-governor/m-p/1676548#M26017

0 Kudos
SimonHF
Beginner
586 Views

Update: I just checked the status of those posts flagged as "spam" and it said I am not logged in. And after I logged in I get this strange message saying I don't have access to the site. However, if this post is posted then I obviously do have access?! -- Simon

SimonHF_0-1742577848169.png

 

0 Kudos
SimonHF
Beginner
584 Views

It looks like the 1st post marked as spam has now had its spam status revoked and it's now a regular forum community post here [1]. Yay!   And I guess the 2nd attempt to post it without the link, which got marked as spam too, got deleted and that's probably why the strange "you do yet not have access to this site" message came up. So it looks like the spam status curse is lifted! Whoever, helped: Thank you! -- Simon

[1] https://community.intel.com/t5/Server-Products/Questions-about-surprising-results-with-intel-cpufreq-governor/m-p/1676521#M26016

0 Kudos
SimonHF
Beginner
583 Views

Also, as an interesting side issue, now that the post is restored and not marked as spam, it's actually not possible for me to edit the post anymore, which is annoying. Maybe somebody could fix that? Thanks! -- Simon

0 Kudos
Reply