I would like to know the difference (if any...), especially from the point of view of the graphics specifications, between the Celeron N3050 and the newer Celeron N3060; from the ARK site I understand that the only difference is the burst frequency: is it so, or am I wrong?
Thanks for your help,
Several differences: http://ark.intel.com/compare/91832,87257 ARK | Compare Intel® Products
In addition to the Burst Frequency as you have noted, the n3060 is one year old, the n3050 two years old.
And, the n3060 has Intel HD Graphics 400.
Both are the same BGA socket, thus removing any option to upgrade the processor, if that is what you are looking for.
Thanks a lot for your quick reply!
> And, the n3060 has Intel HD Graphics 400.
Yes, I saw that, but still, the graphics specification are the very same: I suspect it to be only a new name for the same stuff; but I would be happy to be proved wrong: what has been improved from that point of view, then?
The Intel® Celeron® Processor N3000, N3050, N3150 the graphics are supported by Windows®10 only, you can see it here:
The driver for this product can be downloaded here:
The Intel® Celeron® Processor N3060 on the http://ark.intel.com/compare/91832,87257 supplement information it says "Embedded Options Available", Embedded Options Available indicates products that offer extended purchase availability for intelligent systems and embedded solutions. This graphics version or processor supports Windows®7 32bit only, the driver can be downloaded here:
> The Intel® Celeron® Processor N3000, N3050, N3150 the graphics are supported by Windows®10 only [...]
Linux is very well supported, luckily, as indicated on the chart!
So from your answer I gather that the graphics is the same in the two processors, at least for a personal use: good to know.
Thank you very much for your help Ivan.