Processors
Intel® Processors, Tools, and Utilities
16133 Discussions

Possible mainstream Ideas for upcoming CPU's

specsareuptodate
Beginner
107 Views

So I've gotten the i9-14900K, but when I compare it to a Ryzen 7 7800X3D, they're literally the same thing, is this optimization? I have NO clue. Secondly, the entire reason why AMD is beating Intel is because of their Cache, and all their cores are performance cores. I see why you're trying to conserve energy but for a TOP OF THE LINE I9, something just doesn't seem right here.


Intel should make their CPU's have more cache, this is because it has less times to fetch instructions, faster program execution, and all of the above.
Cache Is important because it can GREATLY improve how rendering goes. For example, Data intensive software require a big ass load of cache!, especially rendering in blender, you need a fat CPU for that.
I am not comparing the I9-14900K to other AMD competitive CPU's. But Intel really needs to work on that, its kicking its own knee right here. There is no really big difference between the 13th and 14th gen I9's and I7's.


Energy Consumption is something very important, I get it how high end Intel CPU's uses a lot of watts considering some of them can even reach speeds up to 6-6.2ghz, although 253 watts is something else! that's insane. Even some 12th gen i5's can reach up to 120 watts.


Core Count really isn't a problem here. although, Intel does need to work on Thread Count, Most i5's do NOT have 12 threads, that's only the high end ones for example: i5-12400F, its more of a 6C/6T, I'm pretty sure i7's only have the capability to reach up to 12 threads, usually core count doesn't mean much in gaming, but its also the rendering, people look forward for a budget friendly build most of the time and for what you're getting, you don't really get the "bang for the buck", that's why people who are budget builders always go AMD because what you get for that price is pretty interesting, i'm a die-hard Intel fan but recently they've not been doing so well for the past 2 years. Now I'm not changing ever since I'm not happy how AMD's CPU's have a extremely low core count considering the Intel i9 14900K has 24/32 While the Ryzen 9 9950X3D is 16/32, good job on that one, really kicked its butt, but unfortunately, its about the cache, that's when the Ryzen 9 won. Please make sure this gets put in as a serious response, I paid a lot for my machine and I get it how its THE TOP OF THE LINE INTEL CPU but its just the cache that really throws me off, I upgraded from a i5-9400F (6C/6T/9MB-CACHE) ONLY A 27MB cache increase, come on!, now I'm not a nerd about computers, but I do know that something isn't right here. Have a good day everyone.

0 Kudos
1 Reply
DhannielM_Intel
Moderator
68 Views

Hello specsareuptodate,


Thank you for posting in the community. I appreciate your suggestion and feedback about the Intel Core processors. I will make sure to raise this matter so it can be heard. For now, I will close this inquiry and if you need further assistance, please submit a new question, as this thread will no longer be monitored. 


Best regards,


Dhanniel M.

Intel Customer Support Technician


0 Kudos
Reply