Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
MCaso1
Beginner
1,015 Views

Could you provide documentation on how your devices are marked (EPM3512AQC208 & EPM3512AQI208)? This will help us mitigate counterfeit components. In addition, is there any change Intel could fabricate these devices again?

We use EPM3512AQI208 & EPM3512AQC208 in our products. These were discontinued earlier this year with the last time buy date of February 2018. One of our approved brokers found some parts but the marking is suspicious as it lists both commercial and industrial part numbers EPM3512AQC208 & EPM3512AQI208. Included is a picture showing the suspicious marking. Since answers to these questions are time sensitive a prompt response is much appreciated.

0 Kudos
8 Replies
Abe
Valued Contributor II
52 Views

Nooraini_Y_Intel
Employee
52 Views

Hi,

 

As announced in PDN1709, the legacy CPLDs are being discontinued due to Intel PSG’s package vendor phasing out its production line and the declining demand for the legacy product families. Thus we can no longer fabricate these devices anymore.

https://www.intel.com/content/dam/altera-www/global/en_US/pdfs/literature/pcn/pdn1709.pdf

 

 

Thank you.

MCaso1
Beginner
52 Views

Nyusof - Thank you for commenting on this. I understand the reason for discontinuance. Since we utilize these in one of our products we could use your help in regards to marking; could you provide documentation depicting marking requirements on these components (see my original message for additional details?

 

Abraham - I appreciate you sending documentation 😊 .

Nooraini_Y_Intel
Employee
52 Views

Hi MCaso1,

 

Please cross check with the supplier that you have bought MAX 3000 devices. If you have purchased the devices from the authorize distributor or supplier, then those devices are authentic (not counterfeit).

https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/partner/where-to-buy/overview.html

 

Regards,

Nooraini

 

 

MCaso1
Beginner
52 Views

Hello Nooraini,

 

For a part like this which is not in regular distribution my company goes through our approved brokers to attain the part. We impose testing requirement to mitigate counterfeit parts. As part of this process, the Component Engineer, in this case me, works with the manufacturer, Intel, to attain any additional information for our analysis. This is why I need your Intel's support. On my original inquiry I asked additional documentation from you on part marking since the part marking looks suspicious but I have not yet received it. Could you provide additional documentation or get me in touch with someone else that can?

ChiaLing_T_Intel
Employee
52 Views

Hi MCaso1,

 

Effective July 28, 2003, Altera will transition from a single mark to a dual mark on its MAX® 3000A products. You may refer to the Customer Advisory ADV0306 for more information.

https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/programmable/us/en/pdfs/literature/pcn/adv0306.pdf

 

In addition, please be noted that Altera has its authorized distributor to sale Altera Devices. If the customer got the devices from formal Altera Distributors, they should be valid Altera devices. Otherwise, Altera do not ensure the device quality and do not provide the further service. Here is solution published for your reference:

https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/programmable/support/support-resources/knowledge-base/soluti...

 

Thank you

 

Regards,

Chia Ling

 

 

 

MCaso1
Beginner
52 Views

Chia Ling - The document was exactly what I needed. Also, could you point me to the Intel/Altera document showing the part number scheme? I cannot find this information. The datasheet for this device does not show this information. As far as counterfeit, I understand the risks; we have a process in place which I mentioned earlier.

ChiaLing_T_Intel
Employee
52 Views

Hi MCaso1,

 

Please refer to the Altera device top side marking format here:

https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/programmable/support/support-resources/knowledge-base/soluti...

 

This is the device date decoder format for your reference.

 

Thank you

 

Regards,

Chia Ling

Reply