- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
(I'm not quite sure if this is the correct thread to post this on so I'm sorry if it isn't)
My uncle (Kirby H Spalding) thought of having a port with an embedded chip controller that would be able to maximize the speed and data of the info with multiple different ways to be able to configure it while working with his company, iAparture Technologies. So they went ahead and made a patent for it linked below. But Intel (and/Or Apple) decided to take that Idea and use it in a different method in which the Thunderbolt port was created.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US6899547B1/en(I
https://patents.google.com/patent/US6984132B1/en?assignee=Kirby+H.+Spalding
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Short answer, no. Your uncle's patent has only one claim (the other claims 2-5 are based on claim 1) and claim 1 is a very specific implementation of a physical connector. Could be worked around without much difficulty.

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page