- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
EP4CE55F23I7N Sample 1 Lot:S112MK80 Date:2113 COO:TW
EP4CE55F23I7N Sample 2 Lot:S002AF25 Date:2001 COO:KR
EP4CE6F17C8N Sample 3 Lot:S042AK5F Date:2043 COO:KR
Lot:S115AF10 Date:2113 COO:KR
Why does KR origin have secondary coating? Could it be a process issue?
The sample dimensions D, E, A, A2, b and e are all measured to meet the manufacturer's specifications, and the sample appearance is consistent with the drawing. X-ray scanning showed that the internal structure of the sample was consistent, and X-ray did not find any abnormality such as internal voids in the sample.
After dissection and decaps, the samples exhibited consistent wafer profile and identical wafers with the word ALTERA trademark, Z1432, V0026, V0029 and 2009 adopt。
Can you explain it for us?
EP4CE55F23I7N Sample 2 Lot:S002AF25 Date:2001 COO:KR
EP4CE6F17C8N Sample 3 Lot:S042AK5F Date:2043 COO:KR
Lot:S115AF10 Date:2113 COO:KR
Why does KR origin have secondary coating? Could it be a process issue?
The sample dimensions D, E, A, A2, b and e are all measured to meet the manufacturer's specifications, and the sample appearance is consistent with the drawing. X-ray scanning showed that the internal structure of the sample was consistent, and X-ray did not find any abnormality such as internal voids in the sample.
After dissection and decaps, the samples exhibited consistent wafer profile and identical wafers with the word ALTERA trademark, Z1432, V0026, V0029 and 2009 adopt。
Can you explain it for us?
Link Copied
1 Reply
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page