- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
<!--[if gte mso 9]> Normal 0 21 false false false NL X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 <![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]> <w:LsdExceptio...
Link Copied
3 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
It looks like you've considered all the important factors.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
Thanks for your query.but I didnt get the question proper.
R u worried abt the VT pros and cons ?and budget.? anyways i have attached NHM white paper ( may be useful)
please revert with the appropraite question for clear answers.
Thanks,
kamal.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
No, I would not say I was worried. Virtualization is exactly the trade-off you mention - it is less expensive on hardware, but you are putting all your servers into one infrastructure.
Was that your question? Or are you more looking for someone to tell you "Yes, you should implement this" or "No, you should not"?
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page