- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- I do have 2 Processors E5-2673 v4 (SR2KE), one has an FPO Code of L637G195 and the other has the FPO Code L823E470. The server will be virtualized with VMware esxi, it will run at least 16 VMs (Windows 2019, Ubuntu and Centos 7), would it be safe to use 2 processors with FPO codes?
If the answer is grey (neither firm yes nor firm no), please clarify what would be the risk that i would be taken should I use these two processors.
I appreciate a clear answer.
Joe
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello,
Thank you for replying back.
As a matter of fact, as additional information that we need to verify in order to deploy an implementation of two Intel Xeon Processors into the same Intel Server Board will be the "S-spec Code".
I was reviewing the S-spec Code of the (L637G195) and it is SR2KE.
Nevertheless, for the second one (L823E470) I was unable to verify the information.
If you already confirm that the S-spec Code for both processors is SR2KE, you should be able to accomplish this implementation without any problem.
Our best recommendation will be to contact the corresponding OEM that provided you the system in order to be completely sure about the S-spec Code.
I hope this information helps you to have a better understanding of your questions.
Best regards,
Emeth O.
Intel® Server Specialist
A Contingent Worker at Intel.
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello,
Thank you for contacting Intel Xeon Community Support.
I would like to let you know that the Finished Process Order (FPO) is used in order to verify the warranty of the Intel Processor.
The serial number of a processor is typically a combination of the finished process order (FPO) number and the assembly test process order (ATPO) number. Please check the following below article about this information in order to have a better understanding:
How to Identify My Intel® Xeon® Processor Markings for Warranty Requests
The FPO and ATPO numbers are not going to affect the performance of your implementation.
Nevertheless, it is very important to verify if your processor supports the features of virtualization such as:
- Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x).
- Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d).
- Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT).
If you have any other questions or additional information, please do not hesitate and let me know and I will be more than happy to assist you.
Have a wonderful day.
Best regards,
Emeth O.
Intel® Server Specialist
A Contingent Worker at Intel.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello,
Thank you for replying back.
As a matter of fact, as additional information that we need to verify in order to deploy an implementation of two Intel Xeon Processors into the same Intel Server Board will be the "S-spec Code".
I was reviewing the S-spec Code of the (L637G195) and it is SR2KE.
Nevertheless, for the second one (L823E470) I was unable to verify the information.
If you already confirm that the S-spec Code for both processors is SR2KE, you should be able to accomplish this implementation without any problem.
Our best recommendation will be to contact the corresponding OEM that provided you the system in order to be completely sure about the S-spec Code.
I hope this information helps you to have a better understanding of your questions.
Best regards,
Emeth O.
Intel® Server Specialist
A Contingent Worker at Intel.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello,
Thank you so much for all the information provided.
As a matter of fact, the information provided is totally correct.
The code that really matters in order to verify the compatibility with this type of implementations will be the "S-Spec Codes" using the FPOs of both the processors. However, as you mentioned the FPO could be different but under each FPO; Intel has the possibility to verify those details of "SPEC TYPE" and "SPEC CODE" and also the OEM in charge of the batches respectively.
I hope the information provided helps you to have a better understanding of this. Please if you have more questions do not hesitate and let me know and I will be more than happy to assist you.
Have a wonderful day.
Best regards,
Emeth O.
Intel® Server Specialist
A Contingent Worker at Intel.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello Joe,
Yes, the information I have provided was confirmed by the experts on this matter.
As a conclusion, the important code in order to verify the compatibility with this type of implementations will be the "S-Spec Codes" using the FPOs of both the processors. Also, it is important to mention that it is not completely necessary that the processors were designed the same tray's batches and also the FPO could be different.
So, the "S-Spec Codes" under the FPOs would be the first details to verify.
Joe, if you have more questions or if there is anything else I can help you with do not hesitate and let me know and I will be more than happy to assist you for that reason I am here in order to provide you the most accurate information.
I hope the information provided helps you to have a better understanding of those details.
Have a great day.
Regards,
Emeth O.
Intel® Server Specialist
A Contingent Worker at Intel.
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page