Intel® oneAPI Base Toolkit
Support for the core tools and libraries within the base toolkit that are used to build and deploy high-performance data-centric applications.
419 Discussions

Python installation (standalone and in BaseKit) fail on Linux

drmiket7777
New Contributor I
5,640 Views

Hello,

 

I am trying to install the latest 1-api offline Basekit or standalone Python (intel.oneapi.lin.python3.product,v=2022.1.0-214) but all fail with the following message:

Unable to complete installation
  Suggestion: Close & Relaunch the installer

  Need help?
    View Developer forum:https://software.intel.com/en-us/oneapi/support
    View our FAQ:https://software.intel.com/en-us/oneapi/support
    (include log file in your support ticket):

  Log file:
    /tmp/mtml/intel_oneapi_installer/2022.05.11.15.50.38.885/installer.insta
    ll.intel.oneapi.lin.python3.product,v=2022.1.0-214.2022.05.11.15.50.58.4
    51140.log

  The following errors occurred:
  Installation of component has failed.                                        X
  Component id: intel.oneapi.lin.python3, name: Intel® Distribution for Python |
  *, version: 2022.1.0-214.                                                    |
  During the execution of the application '/home/mtml/intel/installercache/dow |
  nloadcache/intel.oneapi.lin.python3,v=2022.1.0-214/exec_script.sh' with argu |
  ments '/home/mtml/software/x86_64/RHEL7/intel/oneapi' errors were received:' |
  : No such file or directory                 

I am attaching the log file from standalone Python installation.  Similar problem arises when the Basekit tries to install Python.

I am using the command line install : ./installer... -a -c

on Linux (CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core))

 

thank you

Michael

Can you please provide a workaround?

 

0 Kudos
22 Replies
drmiket7777
New Contributor I
641 Views

Hello,

 

I tried to install the “l_pythoni39_oneapi_p_2022.1.0.214.sh” after clearing ~/intel but it again failed.

I rerun the “l_pythoni39_oneapi_p_2022.1.0.214.sh” with “—ignore-errors" and it finished 

without errors on the stdout/stderr . (!!!!)

 

Here is what was installed:

$ tree -d -L  3    /data/saet/mtml/software/x86_64/RHEL7/intel/intelpython/

/data/saet/mtml/software/x86_64/RHEL7/intel/intelpython/

├── compiler

│   ├── 2022.1.0

│   │   ├── env

│   │   ├── lib

│   │   ├── licensing

│   │   ├── linux

│   │   ├── modulefiles

│   │   └── sys_check

│   └── latest -> 2022.1.0

├── conda_channel

│   ├── bin

│   ├── linux-32

│   ├── linux-64

│   └── noarch

├── dal

│   ├── 2021.6.0

│   │   ├── env

│   │   ├── lib

│   │   └── licensing

│   └── latest -> 2021.6.0

├── intelpython

│   ├── latest -> python3.9

│   └── python3.9

│       ├── bin

│       ├── condabin

│       ├── conda-meta

│       ├── env

│       ├── envs

│       ├── etc

│       ├── include

│       ├── lib

│       ├── lib64

│       ├── libexec

│       ├── licensing

│       ├── pkgs

│       ├── setup_scripts

│       ├── share

│       ├── shell

│       └── ssl

├── ipp

│   ├── 2021.6.0

│   │   ├── env

│   │   ├── lib

│   │   └── licensing

│   └── latest -> 2021.6.0

├── licensing

│   ├── 2022.1.0

│   └── latest -> 2022.1.0

├── logs

├── mkl

│   ├── 2022.1.0

│   │   ├── env

│   │   ├── lib

│   │   ├── licensing

│   │   └── modulefiles

│   └── latest -> 2022.1.0

├── mpi

│   ├── 2021.6.0

│   │   ├── bin

│   │   ├── env

│   │   ├── etc

│   │   ├── lib

│   │   ├── libfabric

│   │   ├── licensing

│   │   └── modulefiles

│   └── latest -> 2021.6.0

└── tbb

    ├── 2021.6.0

    │   ├── env

    │   ├── include

    │   ├── lib

    │   ├── licensing

    │   └── modulefiles

    └── latest -> 2021.6.0

 

74 directories

 

 

0 Kudos
Rachel_O_Intel
Moderator
612 Views

Hi,


We have moved the discussion of this issue to another platform due to the preference of the customer. This thread is now considered community only, and will no longer be monitored by Intel.  


If you need any additional information, please post a new question as this thread will no longer be monitored by Intel.


Best,


Rachel


Reply