- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
本人一直以来都是用intel的产品,用了二三十年了,所以对intel的消费类酷睿处理器很熟悉。Intel很早就有用大小核的想法,只是10代以前IPC性能每代提升很小如果不足以弥补插入小核带来的游戏负优化消费者是不会买单的。到了11代酷睿由于架构的更新IPC确实有了比较大的提升但是频率又略有开倒车导致还是不敢加入小核,直到12代IPC进一步提升并且频率恢复到了10代的水平才开始加入了小核,假如小核后游戏水平确实还有提升只是关了小核提升更大。这就说明小核对于大部分消费者来说是没有任何用的还有负面影响,比如很多场景都是小核干活大核围观这就尴尬了。13代比12代IPC并没有提升但是频率大幅度提升性能提升也不小,14代对于13代而言就几乎没有提升了只是原来基础上官方硬超频而已,13-14代依然维持大小核架构,小核心对很多人来说只能是多核跑分好看,实际是负面影响的。其实很多人都是只需要4-8核高主频的大核而且价格不要那么贵。但是低端的核心少的主频低就只有买I9了。所以我看纯大核才是消费者真正需要的。关于能效,我测试过如果不过度超频纯大核能效也不比小核低多少,比如14900K的8个大核跑5.7G的时候高达250W,跑5.5的时候只要180W,跑5.3G只要135W意思就是5.3G-5.7G提升不到10%的性能要多付出80%的功耗,这是丧心病狂的。你小核心再节能都不能弥补大核心这种丧心病狂的厂家超频。而且封装也不支持这种功耗最后后果很严重导致大面积蓝屏死机返修。芯片这么大热量不能通过钎焊层散热到顶盖无论多好的散热器都无效最后钎焊层一点一点损伤分层然后热保护降频这就是大家俗话说的缩缸。如果是纯大核频率只到5.3不要说4.8核温度会很低,就是16大核功耗都仅270W都比8大核16小核功耗小温度也低但是性能又比原来的8大核16小核强很多,就是不知道intel这傻蛋为啥不这么干?
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello xzszrs,
Thank you for posting in Intel Communities and for sharing your feedback on the past until the latest Intel Processors.
I'll check on this further and I will post an update once it's available.
Best regards,
JeanetteC.
Intel® Customer Support Technician
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello xzszrs,
Please check your email for the next steps. I'll proceed with closing this thread as this will be coordinated with the appropriate team with regard to your suggestions.
Should you need assistance in the future, please submit a new question as this thread will no longer be monitored.
Sincerely,
JeanetteC.
Intel Customer Support Technician
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page