- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
A reflow soldering failure occurred on the exposed pad on the bottom of the QFP64
pin device of the MAX V device. Please let me know if there is a recommended
pattern layout for Exposed Pad.
Please let me know if there is a recommended value for the number and diameter of
through holes to connect the exposed pad to the GND pattern.
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
what kind of failure do you observe, missing connection or short to other pins?
I see a previous discussion related to 64-pin EQFP package https://community.intel.com/t5/Programmable-Devices/Max-V-Stencil-Design-64-Pin-Plastic-Enhanced-Quad-Flat-EQFP/m-p/1574520#M94757
I think, a comfortable option is to place vias beneath the exposed pad, this way you don't need to care for solder drain through vias. As mentioned in my previous post, EQFP package has the problem of clearance tolerance between pad and PCB, about 0.05 to 0.15 mm. You need to supply suffient solder paste to safely bridge the gap.
Regards
Frank
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thank you for your reply.
We have an issue with exposed pad not being connected. There may not be enough solder.
Is there reccomended pattern layout for PCB?
Regards
Nakaj
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Please also tell me the recommended thickness of the solder mask.
Regards,
Nakaj
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello,
Please refer to : https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/programmable/articles/000074532.html
regards,
Farabi
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thank you for your reply.
But I would like to know about reccomended pattern layout for PCB and recommended thickness of the solder mask of MAX V QFP64 device.
Regards
Nakaj
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thank you for your reply.
If you find a solution please let me know.
Regards
Nakaj
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Nakaj,
You can check it here: AN 353: SMT Board Assembly Process Recommendations
Hope that helps and do let me know if I can assist you further.
Regards,
Fakhrul
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thank you for your reply.
I would like to know about recommended thickness of the solder mask(stencil?) of MAX V QFP64 device.
About reccomended pattern layout for PCB, I found a Cadence and mentor graphics CAD data in Intel website.
PCB design engineer tries to analyse it.
Regards
Nakaj
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
stencil thickness is usually chosen by the assembly service provider depending on PCA technology and used pad range. As mentioned above, problem with EQFP package is the 0.05 to 0.15 mm range of exposed pad clearance. If the parts have typical 0.1 mm clearance, 120 µm standard stencil thickness should work, but for maximal 0.15 clearance you'll probably want a thicker stencil, e.g. 180 µm if it's still compatible with small pads used on the board.
I'm presuming that you have industry standard reflow profile as suggested in AN353, because another possible reason for solder failure is "cold solder joint".
Regards
Frank
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thank you for your reply.
your answer is very helpful.
Regards
Nakaj
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
Please let me know manufacturer's recommended conditions for MAX V rework(IC mounting by hand soldering).
For example,heating temperature, heating time, tools etc.
Is there a risk of overheating the IC during rework? (Deterioration, impact on lifespan, etc.)
Regards
Nakaj
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page