On a different computer the same code compiles and runs perfectly
Difficult to answer where would be problem
before require test with old and new compiler on only one of two computer.
Before the first test.
Also can be an flag parameter for Xeon 5520 with new icc compiler not accorded.
Give your command complete, probably here some people better qualified O/S Microsoft that me
and have same your machine can confirm if correctly appropriated and maybe give better.
I think Opemp side is only an factor that favorise existing an problem already.
Can be also leak with last version compiler.
(augmented probability leaks new compiler that older)
(trace all values tables with increased by step )
I have perfectly understand that you have operate change in source...
Two months ago
I have encountered exactly same your problem with function to an program required some (defined) arrays for ip adress IPV4
Used several arrays for different channel have not same size class address
I have wrote first speedily with all array declared same size and all working fine each process working individual thread (OPENMP) (Task largely improved)
After i want adjust all size arrays with appropriate potential element address different class (B & C) and program show wrong result.
The tracing elements array show sometimes blank or address added with (characters type extended ???) Two friends also programmer have modify function
different form and exactly same problem, require all array same size.. (Curioius Lib OPENMP work perfectly at greater other hardness functions in same program)
I have move program to an other computer exactly same (just processor some slower) and program running well with array different appropriated size.
One more time i must observe that my language control English have also some leaks or maybe lib literature conflict..
About lib ??? ( With Linux), if an lib problem , I think problem must persisting with secondary computer is exactly same configured.
I don't know , here just, 3 engineers qualified have confirmed as problem is an leak ???...