- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
vtl activity -c callgraph -app $HOME/Fortran/MATMUL/matmul.81 -moi $HOME/Fortran/MATMUL/matmul.81
vtl view -gui -calls
/opt/intel/vtune/analyzer/bin:/opt/intel/vtune/shared/bin:/opt/intel/comp/8.1.026/lib
VTune Performance Analyzer 3.0 for Linux*
Copyright (C) 2000-2004 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
VTune Performance Analyzer 3.0 for Linux*
Copyright (C) 2000-2004 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root all 16 Apr 13 17:51 /opt/intel/vtune/shared/bin/libcpuinfo2.so -> libcpuinfo2.so.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root all 20 Apr 13 17:51 /opt/intel/vtune/shared/bin/libcpuinfo2.so.1 -> libcpuinfo2.so.1.0.0
-rwxr-x--- 1 root all 18940 Nov 18 19:07 /opt/intel/vtune/shared/bin/libcpuinfo2.so.1.0.0
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
VTune Performance Analyzer 3.0 for Linux*
Copyright (C) 2000-2004 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
/opt/intel/vtune/analyzer/bin:/opt/intel/vtune/shared/bin:/opt/intel/comp/8.1.026/lib:/opt/sgi/mpt/1.11.0.0/lib:/u/lazanoff/shared/bin
columbia4> vtl activity -c callgraph -app ./matmul.81 -moi ./matmul.81
VTune Performance Analyzer 3.0 for Linux*
Copyright (C) 2000-2004 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
PrintCpuInfo32: error while loading shared libraries: libcxaguard.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
PrintCpuInfo32: error while loading shared libraries: libcxaguard.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
VTune Performance Analyzer 3.0 for Linux*
Copyright (C) 2000-2004 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
columbia4. 74>
columbia4.nas.nasa.gov 78> ifort -V -ip -O3 -pad -i8 -o matmul.81 matmul.f90
Intel Fortran Itanium Compiler for Itanium-based applications
Version 8.1 Build 20041123 Package ID: l_fc_pc_8.1.023
Copyright (C) 1985-2004 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Supported emulations:
elf64_ia64
elf_i386
i386linux
--------------------------------
Completion started at Tue May 17 11:37:27 2005
kind real, integer = 8 8
lenx, leny = 1000 2000
hand written time (sec) = 6.972548
matmul time (sec) = 0.8354568
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Here's a bit more of our story: the PrintCpuInfo32 command is being invoked by vtl on an itanium-2 instead of PrintCpuInfo64.
columbia4.65> ./PrintCpuInfo64
GetCPUSpeed:0:34730127,23156,1499,1500
GetCPURawSpeed:0:1499
GetCPUNormSpeed:0:1500
GetIntervalTimerCounterRegister:0:522714908670930
GetProcessorCount:0:512
IsClone:1
GetCPUFamily:0:31
GetCPUFeatures:0:1
GetCPUCacheInfo(0):0:16,64
GetCPUCacheInfo(1):0:16,64
GetCPUCacheInfo(2):0:256,128
GetCPUCacheInfo(3):0:6144,128
GetHighestCPUIDRegisterSupported:0:4
GetCPUIDRegister(0):0:5288754736637306183
GetCPUIDRegister(1):0:1818588270
GetCPUIDRegister(2):0:0
GetCPUIDRegister(3):0:520160516
GetCPUIDRegister(4):0:1
columbia4.66> ./PrintCpuInfo32
./PrintCpuInfo32: error while loading shared libraries: libcxaguard.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Art
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Message Edited by jdgallag on 05-18-2005 10:12 AM
Message Edited by jdgallag on 05-18-2005 10:13 AM
Message Edited by jdgallag on 05-18-2005 10:14 AM
Message Edited by jdgallag on 05-18-2005 10:14 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
/opt/intel/vtune/3.0/shared/bin/PrintCpuInfo32: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped
columbia4 96> file /opt/intel/vtune/3.0/shared/bin/PrintCpuInfo64
/opt/intel/vtune/3.0/shared/bin/PrintCpuInfo64: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, IA-64, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.4.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
GetCPUSpeed:0:0,0,0,0
GetCPURawSpeed:0:0
GetCPUNormSpeed:0:0
GetTimeStampRegister:0:2077286008,2077286008
GetProcessorCount:0:0
IsCPUIDSupported:0
IsClone:1
GetCPUFamily:0:15
GetProcessorSignature:0:2101075
GetCPUFeatures:0:1200128273
GetCPUCacheSize(2):-2147467231
GetCPUCacheSize(3):-2147467231
GetBrandID:0:0
GetProcessorSerialNumber:-2147467231
GetProcessorName:-2147467231
GetHighestCPUIDInputsSupported:0:1,0
GetCPUIDOutput(0):0:1,1970169159,1818588270,1231384169
GetCPUIDOutput(1):0:2101075,66560,1,1200128273
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Message Edited by DaveA on 05-27-2005 09:44 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I have a similar situation, but its bit more complicated because I'm running VTune 3.0 on RHEL4 on dual-Itanium2 with a Sampling Update from Intel Premier Support (Sampling Update README is attached).
[user@linux-server2 ~]$ vtl run a1
sh: /opt/intel/vtune/shared/bin/PrintCpuInfo32: cannot execute binary file
VTune Performance Analyzer 3.0 for Linux*. FOR NON-COMMERCIAL USE ONLY
Copyright (C) 2000-2004 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
The Activity is running.
sh: /opt/intel/vtune/shared/bin/PrintCpuInfo32: cannot execute binary file
sh: /opt/intel/vtune/shared/bin/PrintCpuInfo32: cannot execute binary file
sh: /opt/intel/vtune/shared/bin/PrintCpuInfo32: cannot execute binary file
sh: /opt/intel/vtune/shared/bin/PrintCpuInfo32: cannot execute binary file
sh: /opt/intel/vtune/shared/bin/PrintCpuInfo32: cannot execute binary file
sh: /opt/intel/vtune/shared/bin/PrintCpuInfo32: cannot execute binary file
sh: /opt/intel/vtune/shared/bin/PrintCpuInfo32: cannot execute binary file
sh: /opt/intel/vtune/shared/bin/PrintCpuInfo32: cannot execute binary file
sh: /opt/intel/vtune/shared/bin/PrintCpuInfo32: cannot execute binary file
Thu Jul 7 16:07:31 2005 linux-server2 (Run 0) The Sampling Collector is collecting samples based on the following event(s): L3_READS-DATA_READ-MISS, L3_READS-DATA_READ-ALL, IA64_INST_RETIRED-THIS, CPU_CYCLES.
Thu Jul 7 16:07:34 2005 linux-server2 (Run 0) Sampling data was successfully collected.
sh: /opt/intel/vtune/shared/bin/PrintCpuInfo32: cannot execute binary file
The Activity has finished running.
I do get results after running the Activity and they seem to be reasonable, but, I want to confirm that the results VTune is giving me are indeed correct inspite of these messages about PrintCpuInfo32.
Moreover, I can see that there is a PrintCpuInfo64 present in /opt/intel/vtune/shared/bin/ along with PrintCpuInfo32. Since, its a 64 bit m/c should VTune be executing PrintCpuInfo64 instead of PrintCpuInfo32?
Thanks,
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Verify that you have the 32-bit emulation libraries installed
- Verify that all files permissions look correct (i.e., is PrintCpuInfo32 executable by members of the 'vtune' group?)
- Do not reuse old projects. This problem has been experienced by users updating to 3.0 and attempting to reuse 2.0 projects. Try deleting all .stg? files in the VTune directory in the user's home directory.
Regards,
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
However, now, I need to know how VTune uses PrintCpuInfo32 and PrintCpuInfo64, because I have already gathered lot of data as seen in my earlier post. Is that data valid? I certainly hope so and it seems sensible to me!
Thanks again,
![](/skins/images/45C6C2D737ED71F4C51F0145C8CB1E9C/responsive_peak/images/icon_anonymous_message.png)
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page