Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Discuss current events in AI and technological innovations with Intel® employees
411 Discussions

Optimizing CatBoost Performance

0 0 534

Tricks to Improve Machine Learning Training Performance by Up to 4x

Last updated: 2021-04-19


Gradient Boosting for Data Science

There are plenty of well-known gradient boosting frameworks that deliver accuracy and efficiency in real-world applications. They are regarded as a multipurpose tool to deal with many types of machine learning problems.

According to the latest Kaggle 2020 survey, 61.4% of data scientists use gradient boosting (XGBoost, CatBoost, LightGBM) on a regular basis, and these frameworks are more commonly used than the various types of neural networks. Therefore, reducing the computational cost of gradient boosting is critical. Previous blogs have already covered Intel optimizations to XGBoost training and model converters that speed up LightGBM and XGBoost inference with no loss in accuracy.

This blog covers the CatBoost gradient boosting library. Compared to other libraries, CatBoost effectively handles categorical features and provides a larger variety of growing policies. For example, the SymmetricTree policy reduces the variance of a trained model and significantly improves training time. CatBoost v0.25 introduces optimizations that accelerate training up to 4x compared to the previous release (Figure 1).

catboost figure 1

Figure 1. Relative speedup of CatBoost v0.25 over v0.24.3 for the Higgs1m and Airline1m datasets [1] and the Epsilon dataset [2]

Let’s have a closer look at these latest CatBoost optimizations.

Optimization Details

The training stage of gradient boosting is quite complex. There are many computational kernels requiring specific optimizations to mitigate irregular memory access patterns, parallelize loops with dependencies, and eliminate branch misprediction. Some optimizations for memory-bound workloads (e.g., using the smallest integer type, int8) were already implemented in earlier versions of CatBoost. However, there were still opportunities for enhancement, i.e.: using subtraction for histogram calculation, reducing threading overheads, and introducing a more effective default threading layer backend. Let’s go through these latest optimizations.

The Subtraction Trick

With the Depthwise growing policy, a tree is built level by level in each training iteration. This common approach can be parallelized efficiently over the feature columns and over node construction for nodes on the same tree level. Before training, CatBoost performs a quantization of feature columns to bins. The number of bins is controlled by the max_bin parameter. During training, CatBoost computes a histogram for each decision tree node. Histogram calculations consist of finding the sum of gradients and Hessians for each bin.

Histogram calculations are the most compute-intensive part of the training stage. However, a histogram’s additivity offers a solution to optimize the histogram calculation process. Because the histogram of a parent node is equal to the sum of the histograms of its child nodes, there is no need to compute the exact histogram for each node on the same level. Instead, it is possible to calculate the histogram for the smallest child of the parent node, and then compute the largest child’s histogram by subtracting the smallest child’s histogram from the previously saved parent’s histogram.
This algorithmic optimization was added to the main branch of the CatBoost GitHub repository. It significantly reduces the training time when the Depthwise growing policy is used (Table 1).

catboost table 1

Table 1. The speedup in CatBoost training with the Depthwise policy going from v0.24.3 to v0.25.

Threading Layer Improvements

The performance improvements described in the previous section would not have been possible without threading fixes made by the CatBoost maintainers. Significant threading overhead was observed with Intel VTune Profiler. Much of this overhead was eliminated by increasing the size of each task, but it did not solve the root cause of the issue.

We improved the threading layer by providing an alternative to the custom CatBoost threading layer backend: the Intel oneAPI Threading Building Blocks (oneTBB) library. Integrating the mature, well-supported, and highly optimized oneTBB library into CatBoost resolved the threading overhead problem by providing more effective task scheduling and better nested threading (Table 2).

catboost table 2

Table 2. The performance improvements in CatBoost training with the SymmetricTree policy going from v0.24.3 to v0.25. Times are in seconds.

When using the SymmetricTree policy, oneTBB integration improved performance up to 1.5x over the previous threading layer. The CatBoost maintainers report up to 2x speedups. When combined with the subtraction trick, the oneTBB threading layer improved the training performance for the Depthwise policy (1.65x speedup for Higgs1m, 1.32x speedup for Airline1m, and 1.17x speedup for Epsilon) and yielded total improvements of 3.9x for Higgs1m, 4.1x for Airline1m, and 1.8x for Epsilon.

As of CatBoost v0.25, oneTBB is the default threading layer.


If you’re using CatBoost to train machine learning models, be sure to use the latest version. Up to 4x speedup can be obtained from the optimizations in v0.25, and there’s still more that can be done to improve CatBoost performance. Further core scalability improvements, better memory bandwidth utilization, and vector instructions usage are just a few examples that we expect to be added in future releases.

Hardware and Software Configurations

Intel Xeon Platinum 8280L (2nd generation Intel Xeon processors): 2 sockets; 28 cores per socket; HT: on; Turbo: on; total memory of 384 GB (12 slots/16 GB/2933 MHz). CatBoost 0.24.3 (before optimizations), 0.25 (after optimizations); NumPy 1.15.1; Scikit-learn 0.24.1, oneTBB 2021.2.

Training Parameters

Higgs1m [1] and Airline1m [1]:

{iterations=1000, learning_rate=0.1, grow_policy=’Depthwise/SymmetricTree’, score_function=’L2', border_count=256, scale_pos_weight=2, l2_leaf_reg=1,logging_level=’Silent’, depth=8}

Epsilon [2]:

{max_depth: 8, learning_rate: 0.1, reg_lambda: 0, iterations=500, grow_policy=’Depthwise/SymmetricTree’, logging_level=’Silent’}



  1. The Airline1m and Higgs1m datasets are available in the dmlc xgboost benchmark repository.
  2. The Epsilon dataset is available in the Nvidia benchmark repository.

Notices and Disclaimers

Performance results are based on testing as of dates shown in configurations and may not reflect all publicly available options. Learn more at

Intel technologies may require enabled hardware, software, or service activation. No product or component can be absolutely secure.

© Intel Corporation. Intel, the Intel logo, and other Intel marks are trademarks of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.

About the Author
Mary is the Community Manager for this site. She likes to bike, and do college and career coaching for high school students in her spare time.