- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello,
I'm trying to connect a sensor to EP4CE40F23C7 Cyclone IV E FPGA.
It's supposed to be connected to a bidirectional LVDS drivers, I did the proof of concept with a board with such drivers and it works.
I would like to achieve the same thing without the middle board. The board supporting the FPGA have some FPGA pins directly connected to 2.54mm header pin, including U9 (IO DIFFIO_B13p) and V8 (IO DIFFIO_B13n). I intanciated the buffer_lvds_bidir via the Quartus wizzard and connected as follows :
inst_buffer_lvds_bidir : buffer_lvds_bidir
port map(
datain => sl_DATA_DV_j404,
dataio => io_sensor_data_p,
dataio_b => io_sensor_data_n,
dataout => sl_DATA_RC_j404,
oe => sl_DE_j404,
oe_b => not(sl_DE_j404)
);
Here is the *.qsf extract :
set_location_assignment PIN_V8 -to sensor_data_n
set_location_assignment PIN_U9 -to sensor_data_p
set_instance_assignment -name IO_STANDARD "3.3-V LVTTL" -to sensor_data_p[0]
set_instance_assignment -name IO_STANDARD "3.3-V LVTTL" -to sensor_data_n[0]
set_instance_assignment -name CURRENT_STRENGTH_NEW 8MA -to sensor_data_p[0]
set_instance_assignment -name CURRENT_STRENGTH_NEW 8MA -to sensor_data_n[0]
set_instance_assignment -name SLEW_RATE 2 -to sensor_data_n[0]
set_instance_assignment -name SLEW_RATE 2 -to sensor_data_p[0]
And what I get stopping Fitter step :
Error (176172): Can't place node "sensor_data_p[0]" -- node is a differential I/O node
Error (171000): Can't fit design in device
Could you please guide me to what is the matter ?
Thank you,
- Tags:
- FPGA Design Tools
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Adrien,
It might be caused by pin assignment issue. Is it possible to share your design so that i can debug further?
Thank You.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The pin assignment concerning the bidirectional LVDS signal is given in the form of the *.qsf extract. If a larger view of the design is needed, I may need to do some proofing beforehand.
Thinking about it, it appears to me that it doesn't do much sense to do LVDS with 3.3V IOs. Am I wrong ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Adrian,
Yes, you must use LVDS I/O Standard instead of two LVTTL.
Thank You.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello,
The matter is the IOs I have access to are in a 3.3V bank so I'm kind of stuck...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I understand about the situation. But you will need to use LVDS I/O standard in order to use LVDS. Hope for your understanding.

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page