Graphics
Intel® graphics drivers and software, compatibility, troubleshooting, performance, and optimization
公告
FPGA community forums and blogs on community.intel.com are migrating to the new Altera Community and are read-only. For urgent support needs during this transition, please visit the FPGA Design Resources page or contact an Altera Authorized Distributor.
22755 讨论

Intel UHD 630 Graphics eDP pixel clock limits

myth
初学者
7,052 次查看

Hello,

I have an Intel i7 9750h UHD 630 laptop with 1440p 165hz display. According to the intel datasheet the uhd 630 video card supports HBR2 via eDP port.

According to the display port 1.2 specifications, 8 bpc 720mhz or 17.28Gbps data transfer can be done with HBR2.

But I can't reach these values on my computer.

When I edit my monitor edid information, the pixel clock limited to 655.35 mhz in the Intel driver detailed resolution section, but if I add a resolution in the DisplayID 1.3 extension block, I can reach up to about 668mhz pixel clock limit.

According to the original edid data of my display, it works at 704mhz, but I can't use it without editing edid because I can't go up to this value.

My question is why there is a limit of 655.35 mhz and how did I exceeded this limit with the displayID extension block? And why can't I go above a 668 mhz? Isn't the limit supposed to be 720mhz?

I have attached some explanatory pictures below.

0 项奖励
1 解答
MUC
名誉分销商 I
6,888 次查看

MUC_0-1706215893109.png

 

So you're trying to put a BOE laptop display into operation. The MSI GL65 9SE-225 device originally has a display with 1920 × 1080 @ 120 Hz, which according to the system circuit diagram above is connected to the Intel Coffee Lake GT2.

 

Intel UHD Graphics 630 is stated as shown in one of your screenshots with a maximum of 4096 × 2304 @ 60 Hz 8 bpc (= 2560 × 1440 @ 144 Hz) >>> 605 MHz Pixel Clock (CVT-RB v1). This is probably the tested and released limit. Since the required pixel clock is above the Intel specs, it is probably due to limitations in the drivers, neither of which were designed for your new display, even if the maximum is theoretically 720 MHz pixel clock. I don't think there's anything you can do here.

在原帖中查看解决方案

0 项奖励
6 回复数
MUC
名誉分销商 I
7,032 次查看

These are the Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) parameters for Coordinated Video Timing - Reduced Blanking (CVT-RB):

 

 

v1

v2

 

Aspect Ratio

16:9

16:9

 

Pixel Clock

699.5

679.1

MHz

H Active

2560

2560

Pixels

H Front Porch

48

8

Pixels

H Sync

32

32

Pixels

H Back Porch

80

40

Pixels

H Sync Polarity

Positive

Positive

 

H Freq

257.169

257.235

kHz

V Active

1440

1440

Lines

V Front Porch

3

105

Lines

V Sync

5

8

Lines

V Back Porch

111

6

Lines

V Sync Polarity

Negative

Negative

 

V Freq

164.958

165

Hz

 

Your laptop display appears to require custom timings, which may only be possible in the driver that the laptop manufacturer has customized. Are you using the laptop manufacturer's driver or the generic Intel driver?

0 项奖励
myth
初学者
7,025 次查看

CVT-RB2 is 679.1 mhz pixel clock. But my display not working when i try bigger then 668mhz pixel clock. I am using latest driver from intel right now which is (31.0.101.2125) also tried with OEM drivers but still stuck at 60hz. I want to use my monitor without editing custom timings. I dont understand why my limit is 668 mhz while HBR2 supported ?

0 项奖励
MUC
名誉分销商 I
7,003 次查看

Could you please specify the laptop model?

0 项奖励
myth
初学者
6,991 次查看

MSI GL65 9SE Its not my stock display i just changed, it supposed to work but it doesn't.

0 项奖励
MUC
名誉分销商 I
6,889 次查看

MUC_0-1706215893109.png

 

So you're trying to put a BOE laptop display into operation. The MSI GL65 9SE-225 device originally has a display with 1920 × 1080 @ 120 Hz, which according to the system circuit diagram above is connected to the Intel Coffee Lake GT2.

 

Intel UHD Graphics 630 is stated as shown in one of your screenshots with a maximum of 4096 × 2304 @ 60 Hz 8 bpc (= 2560 × 1440 @ 144 Hz) >>> 605 MHz Pixel Clock (CVT-RB v1). This is probably the tested and released limit. Since the required pixel clock is above the Intel specs, it is probably due to limitations in the drivers, neither of which were designed for your new display, even if the maximum is theoretically 720 MHz pixel clock. I don't think there's anything you can do here.

0 项奖励
myth
初学者
6,804 次查看

Thank you for your explanations. I also didn't know that my DisplayPort is directly connected to the external gpu, which is good for me.

Apart from that, I share below some data I found for who are interested in this subject.

There are many 10th generation core processor devices sold in the market with 1440p 165hz panel. When I look at the specifications of these panels, the pixel clock values are at maximum 667 - 668 mhz. Unlike to the maximum value mentioned in the Intel datasheet, 668 mhz value can be reached. I can confirm this with my own device and a few other devices that I have tested.

Long story short, 668 mhz seems to be the real pixel clock limit for eDP in devices for the 9th and 10th generation. Since there is no software/mod that can exceed this value for now, there is nothing we can do.

0 项奖励
回复