- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
I’m evaluating anti-spoof-mn3 for a real-time presentation attack detection use case in an Android app and will be deploy on client devices. We will not modify the model only run inference on-device.
Could you please confirm the following?
- License & Commercial Use
- Is the anti-spoof-mn3 ONNX model (weights) licensed in a way that permits commercial use in a closed-source Android app (e.g., MIT as stated in the repo/docs)?
- Are there any additional restrictions (redistribution terms, attribution wording, NOTICE requirements) when bundling the unmodified weights in an app?
- Weights vs. Datasets
- Were the released weights trained on datasets such as CelebA-Spoof (or others) that impose downstream usage restrictions?
- If so, do those dataset licenses affect commercial redistribution/use of the resulting weights, or are the weights explicitly cleared for commercial use?
- Attribution & Notices
- What exact attribution text and license files should we include in our in-app OSS notices?
- Do you require a specific citation (paper/repo)?
- Compliance Extras (if any)
- Any guidance on naming/branding usage, or patent considerations we should be aware of?
Thanks,
Soheb.
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Soheb,
Thank you for reaching out to us.
Let me check with relevant team, and we will provide an update here at the earliest.
Regards,
Wan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Soheb,
Thank you for your patience.
1. License & Commercial Use
- Is the anti-spoof-mn3 ONNX model (weights) licensed in a way that permits commercial use in a closed-source Android app (MIT License in Legal Information)?
The model is released under the MIT License (stated in Legal Information).MIT License permits commercial use, redistribution, modification, and sublicensing.
- Are there any additional restrictions (redistribution terms, attribution wording, NOTICE requirements) when bundling the unmodified weights in an app?
Usual obligations: keep the copyright & license notice in redistributions. No restriction against closed-source Android apps.
2. Weights vs. Datasets
- Were the released weights trained on datasets such as CelebA-Spoof (or others) that impose downstream usage restrictions?
anti-spoof-mn3 weights were trained on CelebA-Spoof and other open datasets (documented in model.yml).
- If so, do those datasets licenses affect commercial redistribution/use of the resulting weights, or are the weights explicitly cleared for commercial use?
ANS: CelebA-Spoof itself has a non-commercial clause, but OpenVINO clarifies that released weights are cleared for commercial use (Intel handles licensing due diligence).
3. Attribution & Notices
- What exact attribution text and license files should we include in our in-app OSS notices?
You need to include:
MIT License text (from the repo LICENSE file).
Attribution: “anti-spoof-mn3 model from Open Model Zoo (OpenVINO Toolkit)”
- Do you require a specific citation (paper/repo)?
Citation (recommended but not strictly required): refer to the original paper + OpenVINO repo link.
4. Compliance Extras (if any)
- Any guidance on naming/branding usage, or patent considerations we should be aware of?
No naming/branding restrictions, but don’t use Intel/OpenVINO trademarks as product branding.
No patent clauses are listed in MIT; you can use it at your own risk.
I hope these answers are enough for you.
Regards,
Zul

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page