- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

I discovered a discrepancy between array multiplication and element multiplication with the Intel Fortran compiler, and have a small reproducer here. Is this expected behavior? The discrepancy is very small (seems like one bit), and it only occurs with -O2 and higher, so it seems like an optimization bug to me. I tested it on three machines: a Xeon E5-2650 v3, a Xeon E5-2697 v3, and an i7-6600U.

Any insights on this? Thanks!

! Compiled with: ! ifort -o array_mult_disc array_mult_disc.F90 ! ! Tested with Intel 17.0.6 and 18.0.3. The discrepancy is not ! reproduced with -O0 or -O1, nor is it reproduced by gfortran ! or nagfor compilers. ! ! Demonstrates discrepancy with array and element-wise multiplication ! with Intel Fortran. Order of operations remains the same, but whether ! performing array multiplication, element multiplication, or element ! multiplication of a copy, different answers are produced. program array_mult_disc use,intrinsic :: iso_fortran_env, only: r8 => real64 implicit none real(r8) :: t1, t2 ! if the dimension here is set to 1, both discrepancies disappear real(r8), dimension(2) :: a, b, c, d, e a = 1.0_r8 / 3.0_r8 b = 1.0_r8 / 7.0_r8 c = 1.0_r8 / 13.0_r8 ! array multiplication produces a different ! result than element multiplication e = (a * b) * c t1 = (a(1) * b(1)) * c(1) print '(es30.20)', t1 print '(es30.20, es13.3)', e(1), e(1) - t1 ! element multiplication of a copy produces ! a different result than the original d = c t2 = (a(1) * b(1)) * d(1) print '(es30.20, es13.3)', t2, t2 - t1 ! The following line is necessary for the second discrepancy to appear print '(es13.3)', d(1) end program array_mult_disc

Link Copied

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

It is not a bug. By default, certain optimisations are enabled that may result in small variations in the results of floating point calculations. You can disable those optimisations with appropriate compile options. https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/consistency-of-floating-point-results-using-the-intel-comp... has more information.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

Thank you, that was exactly it. "-fp-model precise" removes the discrepancy.

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page