Latest Patch .048, some mod files out of date?

[ipattielgc]

First, thanks to Intel for releasing the .048 patch, it fixed my "iface:cvf" bugs related to function decoration of routines with character arguments.

However, it seems like some of the mod files in the Include directory are now out of sync. In particular, I had to re-compiler ifcom.f90 to link to:

INTEGER*4 FUNCTION ConvertStringToBSTR(string)
USE OLEAUT32
USE IFNLS
CHARACTER*(*), INTENT(IN) :: string

which I guess was complied with .047. I'll report this to Premier Support, meanwhile re-compiling this module fileis the workaround.

FWIW, after applying the .048 patch, the mod file date is 4/12/2004, 12:18 PM.

-Ian

[Steven_L_Intel1]

No, I see the full kit, as follows:

3/26/2004

Intel Fortran Compiler for Windows*

Compiler

w_fc_pc_8.0.047.exe (135154845 bytes)

Self-extracting zip file containing the Intel Fortran Compiler 8.0 for Windows* Product Update. The package id is W_FC_PC_8.0.047. IA32 Compiler Build 20040318Z, Itanium Compiler Build 20040317. Your support services expire after one year from the product purchase date. At that time, you will no longer be able to install product updates such as this until you renew your support services and receive a new license key. For installation information, please review the release notes

Do you not see this? It is possible that access to it was removed for external users, but I'm not aware that such a thing is done.

[ipattielgc]

Steve, no I don't see what you do, .042 is the latest full install. Only 3/27/04 entry is for some "gl" library or such. Ian.

[Steven_L_Intel1]

Ok - I've sent a request to the appropriate people to have this fixed.

[Steven_L_Intel1]

The guy who manages this says that there should be no problem seeing the file. He did tweak the "What's New" to show it, but it should have been available under File Downloads. If you still can't find it, send e-mail to quad.support@intel.com and explain the problem.

[ipattielgc]

Steve

Thank-you, it is now showing for me. BTW, all my benchmarks with .048 vs CVF are very favourable for your compiler so far. Thanks again, Ian.

[Steven_L_Intel1]

Glad to hear it!